Andy Carrión on the Sarratea house: “The same could happen with the Asia house”

To Andy Carrion criminal lawyer, this same figure could occur with the house of Asia if he Public ministry he discovers that crimes were also committed there.

What does the seizure of the Sarratea house mean?

The seizure and raid that we have been able to observe today is the culminating point of all the investigations that began around the Sarratea meetings. There is not only the case of Petroperú, but many others. The Sarratea case was the beginning of many investigations. In this case, the Prosecutor’s Office has required that this property is no longer available to its original owner, Alejandro Sánchez.

LOOK: Prosecutor seizes house where Pedro Castillo had clandestine meetings

Why is a seizure being made?

The seizure in this case has had as a consequence, in the first place, the regular registration of this property in the name of the Peruvian State. Secondly, it is that the judge has already ordered the dispossession of the aforementioned property to the owner or occupants or third parties who are inside it and it has passed to Pronabe.

Could the same measure also be carried out in the house of Asia?

Yes, that can happen, a clear example is what happened with Sarratea. This always has to happen within the framework of the tax investigation because it has to identify which are the links that would be committed to illegal acts of the people who are being investigated. In the framework of the investigation of Sarratea, the Prosecutor’s Office expresses why it has requested the seizure of the property and part of the idea that this was the place where crimes of corruption and influence peddling were committed. This same reasoning could also be applied to the Asian house. In which it was according to the Prosecutor’s Office it was a den of Fray Vásquez and Alejandro Sánchez.

RECOMMENDED VIDEOS: