Today: December 25, 2024
July 7, 2022
5 mins read

They reject that the political system intends to turn the INDDHH into a distribution of positions

They reject that the political system intends to turn the INDDHH into a distribution of positions


institution-ddh

Days past, it emerged that the new members of the Human Rights Institution and the Ombudsman’s Office would be appointed by “political quota”, so that two representatives would be from the National Party, one from the Colorado Party, another from Cabildo Abierto and another from the Broad Front. .

Law No. 18,446 establishes that the members of the Board of Directors of the INDDHH will be appointed every five years, and will be elected by two-thirds of the votes of the total components of the General Assembly. Social organizations authorized to participate in the extraordinary sessions of the INDDHH may propose candidates to the General Assembly, and parliamentarians may receive proposals and formulate a list of candidates.

It also provides that the Board of Directors of the INDDHH must meet the following requirements: Be persons of high moral authority; have experience and a well-known understanding of human rights; be Uruguayan citizens, natural or legal, in the latter case they must have a minimum of ten years of citizenship; be in full enjoyment of civil rights; not have held elective public positions or positions of particular political trust during the two years prior to their appointment, except for elective positions at the University of the Republic.

Rejection

Faced with the proposal that the Board of Directors be integrated with representatives of the majority parties, seventy civil society organizations linked to human rights reject and denounce the pronouncements that, from the political system, seek to “violate the Law and convert the National Institution of Human Rights and Ombudsman in a distribution of positions, assigning political quotas according to affinity with the government or the opposition”.

“This represents a new attack on the Institution, where the usual losers, the most vulnerable, the most violated, due to the action or omission of the State”, express the signatory organizations.

They assure that the Law is clear and does not admit another interpretation. “Those who will be able to propose applicants are the social organizations authorized to participate in the National Human Rights Assemblies. The Parliament decides, based on these proposals, checking that they comply, among other things, with ‘dealing with people of high moral authority, with experience and well-known knowledge of human rights, trying to ensure the pluralistic representation of the social forces of the civil society interested in the promotion and protection of human rights, in accordance with the principles of gender equity and non-discrimination’”.

They recall that the Uruguayan Parliament unanimously voted for Law 18,446 that creates the Institution. Since then it has meant an enormous enrichment of democratic institutions.

The explanatory memorandum of the rule attributes this intention to it by stating that “by maintaining its real distance from the government, it can make an exceptional contribution to the country’s efforts to protect the fundamental freedoms of its inhabitants and to create a comprehensive culture of respect, promotion and full observance of human rights, in their conception of an independent and indivisible whole -civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights”

The National Institution of Human Rights and Ombudsman defends and protects, controlling all the powers and organisms of the State, which contributes to guaranteeing that people do not see their rights violated. It promotes by informing, raising awareness, educating in human rights and also collaborating with the State for the adoption of good practices. It works autonomously and cannot receive instructions or orders from any authority.

From the group of social organizations with the right to propose applications for the new Board of Directors, it understands that they are obliged to point out other criteria, in addition to those provided by Law, which, based on these ten years of experience, should be considered to weigh the proposals.

“The candidates must be committed to the continuity of the institutional framework, in particular in regard to the defense of their autonomy, competencies, faculties and tasks. For the continuity in the management experience, the permanence of members of the current Board of Directors is important, as recommended by the Law itself, ”says the group.

Respect for human rights whose defense, protection and promotion is entrusted to him in his role as director of the INDDHH “must be manifested both in his career and public activity as well as in the private sphere. It is not admissible that they have participated in or supported acts or expressions of violence, discrimination or exclusion of any nature”, they emphasize.

Therefore, “they cannot ideologically represent, from their sayings and practices, under any circumstances, at any time, the defense of State terrorism.” They indicate the capacity for dialogue and negotiation for the relationship with the representatives of the State that they must control, with organized and unorganized civil society, and with INDDHH officials. Ability and willingness to work as a team, essential in the case of a collective body that proposes democratic and transparent management. Attitude of respect in relation to the role that corresponds to social organizations in the issues they address and the territories where they intervene, and commitment to a greater articulation with them, overcoming the logic of specific calls.

As a collective body, it must integrate an adequate “balance of training, experience and sensitivity” in the thematic diversity that this task includes, with sufficient knowledge of the social reality of the country, commitment to effective access to the Institution for all people in all the country.

Adhere

Civil Association Ágora de Canelones

El Paso Civil Association

Association of Friends of the Memory Museum (AAMuMe)

Association of Social Workers of Uruguay (ADASU)

Association of Former Political Prisoners of Uruguay (CRYSOL)

Uruguayan Press Association (APU)

Uruguayan Association of Gerontological Entertainers and Assistants (AUDAAG)

Center for Archives and Access to Public Information (CAinfo)

Center for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights (CDH)

Charrúa Oipik Udimar Nomad

Collective They

Spyglass Collective

Diverse Collective of Las Piedras

ElePe Collective

Stoves of Memory Collective

Hector Castagnetto Collective

Collective Memory of Toledo

Black Sheep Collective

Collective for Memory Truth and Justice of Tacuarembó (Interiors Network Member)

Collectives and militants against the entire LUC

Commission of Memory and Human Rights of Rivera

Commission for the Rescue of Recent Memory Atlantis (Interiors Network Member)

La Tablada Memory Commission

April Girls Memory Commission

Commission Memory Priest Mauricio Silva

Soriano Memory, Justice and Against Impunity Commission (Interiors Network Member)

National Commission in Defense of Water and Life

Commission for the Memory of the Soca Fusiles

Commission for the Memory of Salto

Commission for the Punta Carretas Penal Memorial Site

Ex Cgior Memory Site Commission

Committee on the Rights of the Child of Uruguay

Mental Health and Human Rights Cooperative (COSAMEDDHH)

Coordinator for the Withdrawal of Troops from Haiti

Daily Woman

Freedom Penal Memorial Space

Federation of University Students of Uruguay (FEUU)

Uruguayan Federation of Housing Cooperatives for Mutual Aid (FUCVAM)

Organized Feminists of the Coast (FOCOSTA)

Mario Benedetti Foundation

Goal Against Impunity

Paso de los Toros Human Rights Support Group

Florida Support Group for Families of Detained-Disappeared

Group of Former INAU Workers for Memory

Working Group for Truth and Justice of Bella Unión (Member of Interiores en Red)

Swollen with Memory

Disobedient Stories Uruguay – Daughters, Sons and Relatives of Repressors for Truth, Memory and Justice

Institute of Legal and Social Studies of Uruguay (IELSUR)

New Moon Educational Research Institute

Intersocial of the City of the Coast

Intersocial Feminist

Intersocial San Jose de Mayo

Mothers and Relatives and Relatives of Uruguayans Detained and Disappeared

Memory in Freedom

Memory, Truth and Justice of Carmelo (Member of Interiores en Red)

Memories of the Coast

National Movement of Public and Private Health Users (MNUSPP)

Round trip organization

Workers’ Inter-Union Plenary (PIT-CNT)

Organized Rebellion

Network of Friends of Luis Pérez Aguirre

NETWORKS Friends of the Earth Uruguay

Peace and Justice Service (SERPAJ Uruguay)

Single Union of Rice and Allied Workers (SUTAA)

Site of Memory “Elena Quinteros”

300 Carlos Memory Site

Ex Memory Site – Cabildo Prison

Site of Memory Ex Hogar Yaguarón of the Children’s Council We Have To See – International Film and Human Rights Festival

plotting resistance

Mides Workers Union (UTMIDES)

Source link

Latest Posts

They celebrated "Buenos Aires Coffee Day" with a tour of historic bars - Télam
Cum at clita latine. Tation nominavi quo id. An est possit adipiscing, error tation qualisque vel te.

Categories

Find out about other important news of this #7Jul
Previous Story

Find out about other important news of this #7Jul

Treasury reestimates expense for subsidies;  IMF praises and warns
Next Story

Treasury reestimates expense for subsidies; IMF praises and warns

Latest from Blog

Go toTop