After it became known that the draft of the final report of the Oversight Commission of the Congress recommends constitutionally accusing the President of the Republic, peter castleyour personal adviser and former president of the Legislative, Daniel Salaverryaffirmed that a summons to the head of state is unnecessary, since the legislators already have an advanced verdict.
“I can be suspicious of that report, even more so when the president of the Supervisory Commission (Héctor Ventura), days before, he already said that they had all the evidence. So, as his lawyer said, Why are they citing him if the commission has already made a decision?” declared for the program “Eighth commandment”.
YOU CAN SEE: Audit Commission will debate this Thursday the final report investigating Pedro Castillo
The former Popular Force parliamentarian supported the decision of Castillo Terrones not to receive the investigative commission despite the fact that he had promised to do so, since he considers that everyone must submit to justice, but this does not oblige the president to submit to “An investigation where due process, the right to defense and who is going to judge you has advanced an opinion and sentenced you before listening to you is not respected.”
Salaverry Villa described as “exaggerated” the decision of the Parliament to seek the censorship of the Minister of the Interior, Dimitri Senmachefor alleged political responsibility in the escape of the former Minister of Transportation Juan Silva.
YOU CAN SEE: Pedro Castillo: what does it mean that Peru Libre has asked you to resign from your party?
“A minister who is just taking office, do you think that in 24 hours he will have absolute management and control of each police unit to be able to orchestrate protection in the way he is being charged? (…) He seems to me not totally pulled by the hair, but the position of the Congress“, he claimed.
