The Subcommittee on Constitutional Accusations of Congress sent to the Superior Court of Justice of Lima the documents that support the constitutional complaint against the president peter castle. Said information was required by the Judiciary as a result of the process of habeas corpus presented by the president’s lawyerEduardo Pachas, so that the admission of the complaint against his client is declared null and void.
The president of the SAC, the congresswoman from the Alliance for Progress Rosio Torres, sent Judge Juan Fidel Torres Tasso, of the Ninth Constitutional Court, the status of constitutional complaint 219, which was formulated by politicians allied with Fujimorism, such as Lourdes Flores and Fernán Altuve. .
“This report is to be scheduled in the Permanent Commission of Congress, to the effect that it considers ratifying the agreement of the subcommittee and, if so, grants the term of regulation for the continuation of the ongoing process”, affirms Torres Salinas in his letter.
YOU CAN SEE: They would not accept “impositions of the PJ” on habeas corpus from Castillo, affirms president of the SAC
The APP parliamentarian also submitted the documentation requested by the Ninth Constitutional Court to the president of Congress, Maria del Carmen Alva.
Photo: document
As part of the habeas corpus process, the aforementioned office of the Superior Court of Justice will grant the floor to the legal defense of the head of state at the oral report hearing on Thursday, March 25, a session that will begin at noon.
Pedro Castillo’s lawyer: “There is a threat to his freedom”
In dialogue with La República, President Pedro Castillo’s lawyer, Eduardo Pachas, provided more details about the habeas corpus he filed in order to annul the admission of the constitutional complaint against his sponsor for alleged treason against the country.
YOU CAN SEE: Katy Ugarte hopes that “habeas corpus prospers in favor of Pedro Castillo”
In the appeal he filed with the Judiciary, the lawyer maintains that the Subcommittee on Constitutional Accusations would have incurred in “violation of the right to individual liberty, due process and the principles of legality and inapplicability of criminal law” by declaring the proceeding admissible. complaint qualification report.
“Habeas corpus is important because there is a threat to their freedom, to their physical integrity, because the crime of treason carries a minimum sentence of 15 years and a maximum of life imprisonment. In that case, the threat is imminent, because the congressmen qualify this fact and do not realize that they are the desperate ones when applying repealed norms”, explained Pachas.
