“The fugitive from justice Pepín Rodríguez Simón dined on the 31st with Rosenkratz in Punta del Este”
WATCH VIDEO
The national deputy Eduardo Valdés referred to the latest revelations that account for the oiled relationship between Together for Change and members of the Supreme Court: “The fugitive Pepín Rodríguez Simón dined on the night of December 31 at the house of Senator Torello in his house in a private neighborhood Club de Mar in José Ignacio, Punta del Este, along with Judge Rosenkantz. A member of the Supreme Court of Justice has dinner with Argentina’s greatest fugitive,” he said.
In dialogue with Futurock FM, the deputy of the Frente de Todos assured that the talks come to light as part of “the internal war of Together for Change.”
“The spying that Macri did on him with the Mario Bros cost Larreta a divorce. They spy on each other. Perhaps they have an inverse moral to what we have”he claimed.
In the same sense, he assured that the chats between D’Alessandro and Robles are actually conversations between Larreta and Rosatti: “The strongest thing is the dialogue between Rodriguez Larreta and Rosatti to circumvent the Constitution, the regulations of the Council of the Magistracy. No Robles speaks, Rosatti speaks. Marcelo Dalessandro is Larreta’s Minister of Security. It is a dialogue between Rosatti and Larreta. Everything that is said there was executed. The same as in the case of the huemules. Everything that is said there later It happened. It’s embarrassing.”
In addition, Valdés invited those involved to appear before the Court and hand over their cell phones: “When the Puf operation was invented for me, I spontaneously appeared before the court with my phone available, and nothing of what they said was going to happen did not appear. “Honesty is shown by handing over the cell phone. Milman, Robles, D’Alessandro, they should hand it over,” he said.
Regarding the request for impeachment to the Supreme Court, the legislator analyzed: “Néstor, in 2003, was threatened by Nazareno for wanting to remove Due Obedience and Full Stop. He had 22% of the votes, but he still initiated the impeachment of the Court. We have to have that same political decision. In the Chamber of Deputies, which is the accusing chamber, we have a majority.”
