Rosario Sasieta on Eloy Espinosa-Saldaña: ​​"It would be very serious for him to aspire to be supreme judge"

Rosario Sasieta on Eloy Espinosa-Saldaña: ​​”It would be very serious for him to aspire to be supreme judge”

For the former Minister of Women, he was wrong by not giving him the protection measures requested by María Montero, against the ex-tribune .

Do you agree with the decision of the Judiciary?

I do not understand how Judge Veramendi has denied the protection measures. First he says: “vulnerability is not explained and proven. The complainant is a lawyer and has tools to develop her financial independence.” Who is talking about financial independence? Or what, lawyers can’t be victims of violence? Then he says that it is not, the relationship of power or dependency has not been explained or proven. How is it possible that a judge who sees issues of violence against women in the context of family violence can remove with a stroke of the pen and say “you are a lawyer, you have money, you can work”.

LOOK: Eloy Espinosa-Saldaña: ​​Constitutional Law Association suspends him for denouncing family violence

How is Mrs. Montero at the moment?

Ask her if she can have a moment of peace or is it that she has taken all her things out of the house, she has only taken a few clothes in the company of a member of the National Police. The defendant has changed her plate and does not allow her to enter, the accused in an arrogant way has told her that he does not move from the marital home, so there is an asymmetric power relationship. What we want? If this happens to a tribune’s wife, what can a country lady say? She has appealed against this decision.

What protective measures have been requested?

These protection measures are not a sentence and the judge knows this very well, he must have given these protection measures because they are precautionary to protect her. For example, that the accused does not approach him.

There is information that Espinosa-Saldaña seeks to be supreme judge. You know something?

It would be very serious, because this is an emblematic case. It cannot be that this person, the defendant, aspires to be a supreme judge, this cannot happen and for this reason, the authorities have to take note and take action. You cannot be indifferent to a case of abuse, be it physical, psychological, or verbal; the damage can be even greater in this regard.

RECOMMENDED VIDEOS:

Ernesto Alvarez

Source link

Previous Story

Zelensky thanks the UK for its “great support” since the start of the war

Next Story

Judicial officer dies suddenly

Latest from Peru