Magistrate must refrain from trial against the former INE secretary: presidency

Magistrate must refrain from trial against the former INE secretary: presidency

Neither, “may it inform the parties or any other person of the meaning of any project before the respective matter is resolved.”

It refers that it will be the Plenary of the Chamber, when it deems it appropriate, who may agree to the publicity of any draft sentence.

That is, “the draft orders, agreements or sentences may not be delivered to a person outside the Electoral Tribunal prior to their resolution.”

The Legal Counsel of the Presidency insisted that for no reason may administrative files be removed from the Electoral Tribunal facilities, except in cases where there is an express instruction, in writing, from the head of the affiliation unit.”

He stressed that with the “leak” of her anticipated position, the magistrate also contravenes the Code of Ethics of the Federal Judiciary (PJF), which in its Chapter II Impartiality establishes that a magistrate must: “… judge with absolute absence of design anticipated or preventive in favor of or against any of the litigants”.



Source link

Previous Story

Sales of pre-owned vehicles of Grupo Pana grew 18% in 2022

Next Story

Classic Stories (IV and final)

Latest from Mexico