The Fourth National Preparatory Investigation Court has scheduled the oral trial hearing against the leader of People’s Force, Keiko Fujimoriwho is being investigated for the alleged crime of money laundering, for next Tuesday, May 31 at 10:00 am
According to the judge’s order Victor Zuniga Urdayin the next session the oral report of the Public Ministry will continue on the case cocktailswhich also involves Mark Vito, Jaime Yoshiyama, Pier Figari, among others.
Last Friday, May 27, another mixed request control hearing was held for the same process against Keiko Fujimori. Prosecutor José Domingo Pérez, from the Lava Jato Special Team, recounted his report on the case.
The Judiciary informs about the hearing against Keiko Fujimori through social networks. Photo: Judiciary/Twitter
YOU CAN SEE: Hildebrandt: Mrs. Keiko, jail is waiting for you, so don’t play the statesman.
What were Keiko Fujimori’s cocktails?
The cocktails of the leader of People’s Force They were activities organized by the Fujimori party to raise funds to pay for the presidential campaign of its boss.
The facts show that, for the 2016 campaign, People’s Force organized six fundraising activities; that is, half a dozen cocktails. In these events, as reported by the same Fujimori party, 4 million 606 thousand 218 soles were collected.
The cocktails were events to which the guests arrived after having purchased cards with prices ranging from 250, 350 and 500 dollars per person.
YOU CAN SEE: Chacón: “Keiko will insist fourth, fifth and sixth time to be president if Fuerza Popular decides so”
In a report from the 2018 Money Laundering Prosecutor’s Office; however, it is pointed out that the Fujimori party could only justify a part of what was collected through “the list of the people who acquired the cards of the proselytizing activities that took place on February 16 and March 29, 2016”.
Along these lines, it was resolved that the party of Keiko Fujimori he was only able to document 30% of the total collected; that is, 1 million 432 thousand 701 soles.
“There is no information to support that these (activities) collected the sums of money that appear in their reports”, indicates the tax report.
