Pronouncements continue on the actions in national territory of the ex-president of bolivian Evo Morales. This time the one who raised his voice was the former head of the Chancellery in the times of Pedro Castillo, Miguel Angel Rodriguez Mackay. In conversation with a local media outlet, who opposed the environmentalist Escazu Agreement During his administration, he emphasized that “as soon as (…) Morales enters Peru (…) you have to have him. He must be subjected to the rules of Peruvian punitive law and be prosecuted in accordance with Peruvian law ”.
As he said in Exitosa, the opinions of the former candidate for the Movement to Socialism (MAS) since the attempted coup of Castillo Terrones disrupt “internally the country by offering separatist pronouncements.” In addition, in his opinion, he “colluses with article 54 of the political constitution, which considers that the territory is inalienable, unpolluted and that it cannot be damaged.”
He also clarified that Morales could not be denounced by tradition to the country due to its foreign status, contrary to the complaint for the same alleged grounds formulated by Admiral (r) Jorge Montoya, of Renovación Popular. “But there are clear norms and rules. The punitive law is for nationals and foreigners, and it applies to everyone equally, ”he added.
Evo Morales’ response to criticism of Peruvian politics
Through his certified Twitter account, Morales Ayma wrote about his “interference in the internal affairs of Peru”: “We turn the other cheek to the political attacks of the Peruvian right. But please, stop the massacres, illegal detentions, persecution and ‘terruqueo’ against our indigenous brothers. There will be no peace without social justice. The deep Peru demands a fundamental transformation”.
Evo Morales’ response to criticism of Peruvian politics. Photo: @evoespueblo/Twitter
