The streets of Pucallpa They became a party for the anniversary of this Amazonian wealth. The parade that took place had the participation of elaborate characters as a representation of the president Dina Boluarte. In the video that went viral on social networks, you can see the character parading on a car, greeting people happily and without stopping showing the doll to the public, which is where he would wear that imitation of the famous Rolex that the man wears.to president Boluarte in her public appearances and for which she was highly questioned.
It is worth remembering that the president had to testify in the Prosecutor’s Office due to the investigation for illicit enrichment where she said: “In principle, I did not know that the watches were high-end. For me they were always beautiful watches that I should use as a loan. Now I have said that there was never any request or intention behind these loans,” he declared after being asked if Oscorima He asked him for something in exchange for the watches he had supposedly lent him.
Dina Boluarte’s government amid serious accusations
The Government of Dina Boluarte, After the presence of a presidential chest in the south of Lima during a trip considered private, it has been the subject of speculation and criticism. The president’s team justified that the trip in question was of a family and unofficial nature, which raised doubts about the true reason for the president’s car in the south of Lima.
Through Freddy Hinojosa, he clarified that it was not an improper use of the presidential chest, but rather that a security protocol was being followed. However, the explanations offered have not been enough to appease the accusations, because in the audios revealed by Captain PNP ‘Culebra’ a voice is heard that supposedly belonged to Minister Santiváñez where he would reveal help to the fugitive from justice, Vladimir Cerrón.
Boluarte government endorses project that could affect free protest
The government of Dina Boluarte has presented a controversial bill that seeks to sanction what it has called “urban terrorism”, which has generated strong controversy because it includes restrictions on the right to protest. According to former state attorneys, this project could violate civil liberties, allowing authorities to limit demonstrations under the premise of protecting public order.
The bill proposes to punish acts of violence in public protests, including attacks on private and public property, but it has been noted that the definitions of urban terrorism are ambiguous and could be used to repress free expression. The proposal also includes harsh sanctions for those who incite violence or disturb order during demonstrations.
The congressmen, for their part, have defended the proposal claiming that it seeks to maintain security and order in the country, especially in the face of uncontrolled situations during demonstrations. However, this could have possible consequences on fundamental rights, which have generated an intense debate in the political and social sphere.
