MIAMI, United States.- Gustavo Petro’s experiment in Colombia will probably go completely wrong. Mario Vargas Llosa has said it with all his letters. Colombians voted wrong. Also the Peruvians, and the Argentines and the Mexicans. Voting for the worst option is within everyone’s reach. Mario is an excellent writer, Nobel Prize winner in 2010, but he is not the Oracle of Delphi, nor does he try to appear so. He is simply an experienced person who comes from the left.
Why can something so pessimistic be assured? Petro just won some elections in front of a picturesque old man, very rich, convinced that corruption is the source of all evil. The majority, however, have given Petro a good boost. He narrowly beat Rodolfo Hernández, former mayor of Bucaramanga, and today, days after assuming the presidency, he enjoys the broad support of 64% of Colombians. (Colombians are not opportunists, but rather behave like other peoples: they tilt hopefully towards the winner in the last general elections.)
Let us assume that Petro is an intelligent man and that he is full of good intentions. Colombians clearly want to put violence behind them and have elected the first left-wing president in the country’s history. After all, he was a 17-year-old boy when he was a member of the M-19. At that age many foolish things are done. At the age of 19, Mario Vargas Llosa was a member of the Peruvian Communist Party. Petro wants to end poverty and the corruption that has afflicted Colombians since time immemorial. Can he?
I do not think so. It is opposed by two or three fundamental notions related to perceptions. Petro remains a guerrilla in the eyes hardened by the experience of the right. Many people hold him responsible for the kidnapping of children, for the rape of young girls and teenage boys, for thousands of murders, for the displacement of millions of peasants, for destroying a good part of the material wealth of the nation and, lately, for having been a lousy manager of Bogotá, the city that gave him the mayor’s office. The general consensus is that he was a lousy mayor, but a good parliamentarian.
As for corruption, it must be admitted that it begins with the sale of personal votes. Plinio Apuleyo Mendoza told me, saddened, that on the coast this type of repugnant transaction is very frequent. Politicians take advantage of the misery of the poorest sector of society to buy their ID cards. It is not surprising, then, that the cancer of the illegitimacy of origin metastasizes throughout the social body and is transformed into juicy “commissions”.
The division between free and private enterprise (plus the market) and socialism no longer exists. Experience tells us that socialism, the closer it got to communism, the more it failed markedly. Perhaps it is that it has not been possible to create a reliable model. Chinese communism, between metaphors that referred to cats and mouse hunting, very Chinese, led to a single-party dictatorship plus “entrepreneurship.” Something like the military boot combined with private enterprise. Russian communism, on the other hand, had another drift: “crony capitalism”. To prosper in Russia, they resorted to gangsterism.
Petro intends to count on his adversaries to create wealth. He tries to recruit the big and medium businessmen. Without their investment and that of foreign companies, there will be no overcoming of poverty. And that money will flow abroad, to more hospitable markets. That is the story of Miami (and of Hialeah, the only city in the USA where Spanish is truly and fully spoken). Miami thrives on the failures of Latin America. There is already a swarm of Miami bankers, some of them of Colombian origin, requesting the money saved by the businessmen. That is to say, there will be no “money to create more money” in Colombia, because the capitalists perceive Petro as an enemy of free enterprise and the market, and they practice and recommend staying on the lookout for what is going to happen in Colombia. in the medium term.
What is the Colombian “medium term”? Nobody knows. But, without a doubt, it is an elastic concept that will last as long as the prophecy that “Petro is the same Petro as always”. Unless Petro realizes the situation and declares himself pro-market and pro-free enterprise, but taking the necessary measures to be credible.
Frankly, I would be surprised if Petro started a really pro-capitalist government. That would be asking for pears from the elm tree.
OPINION ARTICLE
The opinions expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the issuer and do not necessarily represent the opinion of CubaNet.
Receive information from CubaNet on your cell phone through WhatsApp. Send us a message with the word “CUBA” on the phone +1 (786) 316-2072, You can also subscribe to our electronic newsletter by giving click here.
