On July 1, the substitute judge for Administrative Litigation, Alejandro Recarey, ordered the Ministry of Public Health (MSP) and the company Pfizer a submit information regarding coronavirus vaccines, their composition, their side effects, and the contract between the government and the company. The resolution also implicates information linked to Sinovac and AstraZeneca vaccines.
The decision comes to give rise to a request for protection from the lawyer Maximilian Dentone, that in his own name he went to the Judiciary to demand information from the government and the US pharmaceutical company. Lawyer demanded the “suspension of vaccination against covid-19 in children”since it understands that the State “he carries out a real experiment, taking children as ‘laboratory mice’” with his vaccination.
Recarey, who entered the court as head of the Judicial Fair that began on July 1gave 48 business hours to the agencies involved to submit information on 15 Dentone ordersas explained by judicial resolution 1189/2022 to which he agreed The Observer. The MSP He is already collecting information to present it in court next Wednesday at 9 a.m.reported the Minister of Health, Daniel Salinas, to The Observer.
Among them, Pfizer was “very especially” summoned to state if “it has admitted, in any field, internal or external to it and its partners, the verification of adverse effects of vaccines”, especially in what “relates to the child population” .
According to the writing, “it is necessary to have a maximum of factual elements of judgment to elaborate the weighting pertinent to the object of the amparo”that allow “study the reality on which it is projected” the case.
Dentone defended the legislator Cesar Vega when he accused journalists of defamation, after presenting two women in Parliament who claimed to magnetize metal objects after being vaccinated against the coronavirus but, nevertheless, they had not been vaccinated.
orders
1) file a “certified copy” and “complete” of “each and every one of the purchase contracts” of the vaccines against the coronavirus that the organisms have subscribed or “simply are within their reach”.
The organisms must declare if “said instruments have contained civil indemnity clauses” or “criminal impunity” for providers.
2) Give “extensive detail about the biochemical composition” of all the vaccines given in the country (Pfizer, Sinovac, AstraZeneca), but especially that of Pfizer, for being used in minors.
3) Explain if “the doses are distributed by lots or differential items“. If it is the latter, the judge he asks to know “for what reason, and based on what criteria, each one would be provided to different segments of the population.”
4) Specify which vaccines “contain the substance called ‘messenger RNA'”, explain what that term means, and detail “what therapeutic or extra-therapeutic consequences -adverse or not- can they entail for the person inoculated with it”. Agencies must substantiate their response if they maintain that this mechanism is harmless.
5) To inform about “the possible presence of graphene oxide in so-called vaccines available to the population.
6) Inform if the vaccines contain “nanotechnological elements”. In these last three claims, it is requested to specify if the components of the vaccine are unknown.
7) Certify “if the substances contained in the so-called vaccines supplied in Uruguay, Are they experimental or not?and if “they are approved” by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), or for “another type of emergency permit”.
They must also prove if any entity, state or pharmaceutical, admitted “the experimental character of the aforementioned ‘vaccines'”.
8) Present the information available on what “scientifically it is known -and it is not known- about the effectiveness” of these injectionsand its “short-, medium-, and long-term aftereffects”.
9) Provide the “official figures” of the “negative or positive incidence” of vaccination in regards to “the number of infections and deaths” by coronavirusfrom the start of the vaccination campaign to date.
10) State “whether studies have been carried out to explain the notorious increase in deaths from Covid-19 as of March 2021”.
eleven) detail the global average age of those who died from coronavirus in the countryY how many of them were “for” the coronavirus (due to the disease) and how many “with” the virus (not directly due to the disease).
12) Demonstrate “scientifically” if the unvaccinated are a “health hazard for the entire population”. If the answer is affirmative, Recarey asks to know “the dDetermination and demonstration of the degree of danger“, if the vaccinated and the unvaccinated “they spread equally, or not”, and let it be explained why “vaccination would not have been mandatory”.
13) Clarify “Reasons for Lack of Informed Consent” in Government Vaccination Campaign.
14) Provide the identity of the “professional technicians” who “have directed and direct” this campaign, or have advised the government “at any level”. It is also requested that it be specified if any of them is part or part of “any foreign governmental or paragovernmental organization” or “any multinational company” focused on the area of health.
15) State whether “alternative” therapies against coronavirus were studied. If the answer is negative, the authorities must clarify “why weren’t those exits explored”and if it is positive, they must provide the results of the investigation and if they were used in Uruguay.
