Gutiérrez analyzes the Government in Era electoral.
It shows that we are in electoral times.
Definitely. The government is in survival mode. I do not see arrest to move forward public policies. It is already a government that is in a kind of self -induced coma. You have to wonder every day if you are still alive. Because the public policies that should be carried out, I do not see them. I don’t see leadership in any sector. And all the economic institutionality is very weakened after the Castillo-Boluarte government, with nuances in favor of Boluarte. In terms of economic institutionality, it has done terrible damage.
Economic growth is not for the government …
Some may say that the country has interesting indicators, but it is not due to the government’s merit. It is by merit of the external sector and the terms of exchange.
If it weren’t for this government, would we grow more?
Of course. The terms of exchange we have now had them more than half a century ago. This is a boom with a tail wind that favors us at all ends. However, we are not taking advantage of because we have a lousy management. In the governments of Toledo, García and even in Humala’s the country grew to 4.5% or 5%. With Toledo it was 6% and peak. And with Garcia they were 7.5% and a little more. Those fifteen years were very positive for the country, with all the deficiencies that can be indicated. And with terms of exchange that are not comparable to the current ones. Someone would say that the economy grows to 3%, but that figure is below world growth. This happens by a issue of governance. It is not a issue of sailor, but captaincy. The captains of the sectors are not giving the size.
Does this captain problem reach other state officials?
Definitely. I will submit a report on how much the legislative acts have cost us in these five years. There is an enormous ignorance and irresponsibility that will cost us a lot. They are very amateur legislators who have their own agenda. The Executive is three quarters of the same. Castillo practically destroyed the ministerial cabinets. We were on the edge of the precipice. They initially improved with Mrs. Boluarte, but then they have weakened because she has put himself in survival mode. He has not had leadership. Nor has he had a plan. Many ministers have changed in sensitive wallets. He has not managed, but has survived. A lot of improvisation.
TAKE INTO ACCOUNT
“The institutions are very affected. The Prosecutor’s Office is not saved. Even the Ombudsman’s Office. The great threat is populism. Whether left or right, in what they commune is in populism. Measures that seek to act reactively, to the rhythm of the wave or trend, protect themselves in voluntarism or messianism. Populisms seek tension, polarization and aggressive discourse.
