The program “La caja negra”, broadcast by Unicanal, exposes the case related to the complaint against the Authentic Radical Liberal Party (PLRA) about an alleged fraud by the party institution to the detriment of the Zelada Fischer family, in relation to the purchase of a property adjacent to the party headquarters, located on Iturbe street, between Manuel Domínguez and Teniente Fariña, for the expansion of the liberal premises.
Source: The Nation
According to the complaint made by the owners of the property, it was to the agreement for the sale of the land with the PLRA authorities. Only 25% of what was agreed was paid. The heirs of the legitimate owner denounce that they were allegedly defrauded by the liberal leaders and stripped of their property. This situation is aware of the party president, Efraín Alegre, who ignored the claim and never updated.
In this regard, yesterday Wednesday he gave details of the entire ordeal of the family the architect Luis Zelada Fischer, son of the woman who put the property up for sale, in contact with the program “That’s how things are” on Universo 970/Nación Media radio. He himself recounted that the whole process began in 2010, when his mother decided to sell said property and, at that time, the PLRA executives were interested.
“In 2010 my mother decides to put the property that father had left her up for sale, she entrusts her children, us, to see how it is done. I personally contact the neighbor of the house on the left side and my brother Aníbal contacts Mr. Franco, with the directors of the Liberal Party. The Liberal Party is very interested and a sale agreement is reached”, explained the architect.
THE CONDITIONS
Once the sale agreement was closed, the Party established some conditions that were fully met by the family; however, this was only the beginning of a long procession for the Zelada Fischer family. At this time, the payment of G. 108 million was made in check to the widow and the remainder of 432 million until now has not been made.
“All the conditions are established, a very good relationship so far, and they establish and ask that the notary public to take charge be the notary public Maribel Esteche; the contract is made, it is signed, it proceeds. They deliver money on account establishing some normal conditions of a transfer or assignment of property rights where they say that with compliance with judicial restraint, because the land had a problem of measurements, both the transfer and the assignment of rights are delivered so much is given Spectacular,” said the victim.
He also said that the family was committed to complying with all the requirements that were requested at that time for the transfer of rights and that was the last action carried out by the family, and from then on they no longer received a response from the party to close the deal. “From there we did not know anything about the payment, nor to close the deal, or anything, “he claimed.
“A NEBULA”
On the other hand, he also explained that the current authorities of the Liberal Party are aware of this entire process; however, they still do not find answers. “We asked for an audience, we asked, we talked, until we got to the point that we had to send collated so that they please pay us the balance we had, we had collated at that time with President Amanda Núñez, was one of those who signed; Senator (Ramón) Gómez Verlangieri, who was the treasurer, and the notary so that they proceed to close the deal, ”he indicated.
The response the family received is that the party He has already issued a check for the payment, but in the name of the notary in charge of all the actions, who strikingly also has a conviction for a similar case. “I had no order from the owner for any payment. Gómez Verlangieri said that he gave an undated check in the name of the notary Maribel Esteche, we have a copy of the check, our question is the following: if you are going to deposit a check for someone in a notary, not in the name of the notary”, he questioned .
He affirmed that there is a nebula in relation to this situation and that everything indicates that it was a plot to strip the family of the property. “There is a nebula there where evidently we came to the conclusion that it was a whole plot to dispossess property between the PLRA and the notary, because the notary here is also active within this system. She already had problems before with other properties where she was sentenced, it was with the INDI or with the Indert, I’m not sure, “she said.