The PSA personnel carried out “an exhaustive search with a great level of detail on all the available spaces of the plane, and even the personal effects of the crew that had been left there,” said those close to the defense of the crew.
The regime of President Nicolás Maduro demanded this Tuesday that the Argentine government return the Boeing 747 aircraft, registration number YV3535, of the company Emtrasur, a subsidiary of the Venezuelan state-owned company Conviasa, which remains seized in Buenos Aires.
The request was made through a lawyer for the crew, Hernán Carluccio, who filed a brief before the federal judge Federico Villena, in charge of the case, arguing that “it lacks interest for the investigation after the raids and supervised carried out” .
This was stated by defense sources in a newspaper note Clarionpublished this Tuesday, June 21, 2022.
According to the Argentine media, the document specifies that the Venezuelan-Iranian plane “no longer plays any relevant role in the investigation, because various inspections and raids were carried out on it.”
Last week, Judge Villena ordered the arrest of the aircraft, which has been detained for more than ten days at the Ezeiza Airport.
During the raid, two black boxes were obtained so that specialized engineers and personnel from the National Civil Aviation Administration (ANAC) could analyze the information, which will be compared with the statements and documentation presented by the company to justify its arrival at the airport. country.
During the inspection, requested by the prosecutor Cecilia Incardona, a tablet was also seized which, because it does not have an access code, is surely an expertise with a specific system to extract its content.
The clarin He recorded that a few days after arriving in Argentina, a search of the plane had already been carried out by order of the Airport Security Police (PSA).
The PSA personnel carried out “an exhaustive search with a great level of detail on all the available spaces of the plane, and even the personal effects of the crew that had been left there,” said those close to the crew’s defense.
In this requisition panels were removed, galley, trolley, ovens were checked, the personal products of the crew members were checked. This “without giving any kind of foundation or showing any documentation,” reiterated the defense attorney.
Among other things, the letter confirmed “the ownership of the aircraft by Emtrasur,” defense sources explained. This point is something that justice investigates.
Post Views:
284
