Today: November 17, 2024
June 9, 2022
1 min read

Venezuela objected to the ICJ’s admission of Guyana’s claim for the Essequibo

Venezuela objected to the ICJ's admission of Guyana's claim for the Essequibo

The Venezuelan Foreign Ministry recalled that what is in force to settle the Essequibo is the 1966 Geneva Agreement, for which it stressed that the solution must be negotiated without the presence of the ICJ


The Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a statement on Wednesday, June 8, in which it reports that the International Court of Justice (ICJ) admitted the lawsuit filed by Guyana in the “unilateral lawsuit” before that instance for the dispute over the Essequibo territory.

The letter indicates that the Venezuelan Foreign Ministry filed a preliminary objection to the ICJ for this action and demands that Guyana’s claim not be admitted because there is a lack of elements for a due process to be established.

Reiterates the unrestricted adherence to the 1966 Geneva Agreement as the tool to resolve differences with Guyana over the Essequibo, while rejecting the use of the ICJ to resolve this dispute, which, in Caracas’ opinion, should be done in a negotiated manner without that this international body participate in the process.

Therefore, the Foreign Ministry hopes that the Essequibo issue will return to the field of friendly negotiation and that what is established in the agreement will be applied.

In March 2022, Guyana unilaterally presented its arguments before the ICJ – since Venezuela considers that this Court does not have jurisdiction for this process in the Essequibo – which was required by the court in mid-December 2020; seeking to dismiss what was achieved in 1966 and validate the arbitration award of 1899. On that date, the UN judicial body declared itself “competent.”

*Also read: AN of 2015 requires the regime to present a countermeasure on the Essequibo before the ICJ

As of the date of the pleadings, Guyana asserted that the ICJ agreed in its last decision “that it has jurisdiction to settle the dispute,” to which it adds that in accordance with the 1966 Geneva agreement “the parties conferred – on the Secretary General of the UN – the authority to determine the means by which the controversy between Guyana and Venezuela will be resolved”.

Venezuela and Guyana have disputed possession of the Essequibo for more than a century. The dispute over that territory became relevant again after the discovery of a large oil field by Exxon Mobil in the disputed territorial sea.

The UN, guarantor of compliance with the Geneva Agreement, decided that the “good officiant” mechanism was no longer in effect, for which reason the jurisdiction of the case passed to the International Court of Justice; Instance that Caracas assures has no interference to resolve the conflict over the Essequibo.


Post Views:
81

Source link

Latest Posts

They celebrated "Buenos Aires Coffee Day" with a tour of historic bars - Télam
Cum at clita latine. Tation nominavi quo id. An est possit adipiscing, error tation qualisque vel te.

Categories

Aranguren criticized Together for Change for the complaints against the gas pipeline tender
Previous Story

Aranguren criticized Together for Change for the complaints against the gas pipeline tender

Beneficiaries of the INAU will access work internships in the Presidency of the Republic
Next Story

“We have an unemployment rate that is the lowest since 2017, labor informality has been reduced and we have recovered the jobs lost during 2020”, assured the Minister of Labor and Social Security, Pablo Mieres, in his speech at the 110th Conference Labor International. In addition, he mentioned the teleworking law and various subsidies that were implemented to maintain employment in Uruguay. “The pandemic unleashed very unfavorable circumstances that negatively affected the population, and, in particular, work, which generated an increase in pre-existing inequities and greater vulnerability of the weakest,” warned Mieres, in Geneva, Switzerland, during the conference that takes place between May 27 and June 11. The meeting is attended by delegates from governments, workers and employers from the 187 member states of the International Labor Organization (ILO). The Uruguayan leader highlighted that since March 2020 solidarity, cooperation and the search for equity have been reaffirmed as a path to recovery centered on the human being and in a fairer and more inclusive work. He explained that in our country, since the beginning of the health emergency, measures have been adopted to protect those most affected, protect workers and support the sustainability of companies. “The unemployment subsidy was used very intensely to support the income of workers and alleviate the situation of companies,” Mieres stressed, who highlighted that, in addition, specific subsidies were granted to informal workers and monotributistas. On the occasion, he valued the vaccination campaign that made possible a sustained reactivation of the occupation and allowed the end of 2021 with better indicators than before the pandemic. Likewise, he reported that at the end of 2021 the employment promotion law for vulnerable sectors was approved, in which subsidies were established for employers who hire young people, women, people over 45 years of age and with disabilities. The hierarch insisted on attention to the new modalities of labor relations as a consequence of technological development and exemplified with the regulation of the norm regarding teleworking. He also announced that a project will be presented to ensure the rights of those who work in companies through mobile applications. At the end of the conference, the director general of the ILO, the Englishman Guy Ryder, will step down after 10 years in office. In his place, the Togolese Gilbert Houngbo will assume. Presidency

Latest from Blog

Go toTop