About to meet 100 days of the return to the power of Donald Trump, El Salvadoran Kilmar Abrego García It is a nightmare for the US government, unable to pass the page before the effort of judges and democrats in defender of their right to a trial.
In the case of this migrant in an irregular situation deported to El Salvador there are two very different sides.
On the one hand, Trump and his team Machacan a newspaper that It is not the father of the family that paints the press but of a dangerous man.
“It is not a very innocent guy” but “An illegal migrantmember of the MS-13 gang and foreign terrorist, “said the Republican tycoon reading a document from his cabinet.
“This comes out of the State Department and very legitimate sources (…) It is supposed to be something certified,” he said.
He added that when the Salvadoran was arrested “he wore a sweatshirt with money bundles”, considered A MS-13 symboland was accompanied by “two of the most violent members we know” of this “gang of thug.”
According to the president, in 2022 he was arrested transporting seven people from Texas to Maryland, near Washington, without driving and in 2020 and 2021 his American wife “requested a protection order against him and said he was violent and abusive and really scary.”
The other face
History has another face defended by US courts and opposition as the only true one.
The judges, including the Supreme Court of conservative majority, ask the Trump administration to “facilitate” the return of Ábrego García after he recognized that he was expelled for an “administrative error.”
And in 2019 a court permanently revoked the possibility of ESCUE TO EL SALVADOR.
The last judge to take the floor in a Court of Appeals determined on Thursday “shocking” the government’s position to refuse to bring the Salvadoran back and leave it in “an endless limbo without appeal to the law.”
The Democrats, in trouble to shade the incubusible Republican, who governs by a decree, closed ranks around the Salvadoran migrant and took a step forward.
Senator Chris Van Hollen traveled to the Central American country, where he managed to meet with Ábrego García, who according to the congressman was first held in a high security prison known as CECOT and then transferred to another in Santa Ana “where the conditions are better.”
The meeting was held at the restaurant of a hotel, in a scene that contrasts with the videos released by the government of President Nayib Bukele of alleged gang members forced to run with the body hunched over the vans that wait for them to take the CECOT and make them in cells.
Bukele, criticized for refusing to send the migrant back, ironized by sharing photos of the meeting in his social network X.
“Kilmar Abrego García, miraculously resurrected from the ‘Extermination fields’ and ‘torture’, now taking margaritas with Senator van Hollen in the tropical paradise of El Salvador!”, He wrote and added that he will stay in the country.
It was “a montage,” said Van Hollen, who called the “Margarita-Gate” episode.
“Allow me to be very clear, none of us touched the drinks” that “one of the people of the government” deposited and “seem margaritas,” he said to his return to Washington.
Braggart
On his Truth Social Trump platform he described as “silly” and “bluff” to the Democratic senator.
“It’s a fake,” he added in the White House.
Van Hollen and other Democratic congressmen try to mobilize in the face of criticism from the progressive electorate. Too well -faint -hearted for the taste of some horrified votes with some of Trump’s policies, including the mass dismissal of officials and a tariff offensive that, according to experts, will raise prices.
Democrats coincide with justice in which Ábrego García must return to the United States to undergo due process. They invoke the Constitution.
“This is the man that Democrats want us to bring back from El Salvador to be a happily installed member of the United States family. Isn’t it a shame?” Trump protested this Friday.
Van Hollen replied: “If you deny constitutional rights to a man, threatens constitutional rights and due process of all others in the United States.”
