A criminal proceeding for the alleged production of inauthentic documents would have the objective of disregarding a million-dollar debt for discounting checks and there is a lot of pressure from a member of the Magistrates’ Prosecution Jury, which makes the prosecutor Osvaldo Zaracho act in a biased and arbitrary manner. , as reported by the lawyer Mirna Kuchenmeister, legal representative of the accused.
The company Credi Merco SA made the discount of checks to the shareholders of the firm Centro Agrícola SA, for an amount of USD 1,200,000, but later one of the partners, Anoir Frizon, denounced those responsible for that company for an alleged production of non-authentic documents, alleging that the checks were not completed on the date part and that his business partner, Carlos Baliati, delivered those payment documents from hiding.
“My clients were reported to the Prosecutor’s Office, the accusation was quickly made, but all the steps we requested have obstacles, while from the Zaracho prosecutor’s unit, even the notifications are addressed. We ask that the expertise of the checks be made and until now it has not been possible, but we add as evidence those that we ordered to be done by our side and they show that the handwriting is from the same person, ”said the lawyer.
The statements of Frizon and the accountant of the company were requested by those affected on several occasions, but the Public Ministry does not process, in addition to other requests from the defense, which are ignored, according to complaints.
BACKGROUND
The directors of the firm Centro Agrícola, opened a call for creditors, where those of Credi Merco were presented, but they opposed claiming that it is extemporaneous, however, the credit verification incident was favorable to the creditors. Even in the accounting expertise it is shown that they declared those amounts as debt.
Then, in October of last year, Frizon denounced the directors of Credi Merco for producing inauthentic documents, alleging that they had problems with their partner Carlos Baliati and that he, from hiding
“Those circulatory titles were discounted by my clients, they know they should, but they file a complaint with the Prosecutor’s Office, they got my clients charged and I have precise information that there is a member of the Magistrates’ Prosecution Jury (JEM) who calls and presses for that file. So, what could we expect? The prosecutor is acting badly, but we are going to report him to the JEM, if he is acting badly with the endorsement of one of the members”, the lawyer Kuchenmeister dispatched.
He also added that this type of complaint would be a modus operandi of his counterpart, who are prosecuted for the same punishable act, because they have falsified promissory notes, defrauding the Banco do Brasil, without an oral trial having been achieved so far in the case, for interference of people who use the organs of the State for their personal benefit.
