The PNP captured the ex -fiscal María Maita Luna Flor After having been more than 20 years fugitive from justice. In 2002, Justice ordered the arrest of Maita Luna for allegedly having integrated a criminal organization created by the ex -dictator Alberto Fujimori and Vladimiro Montesinos. Therefore, the Prosecutor’s Office investigates it for the alleged crimes of bribery (bribery) and illicit association.
According to the fiscal thesis, Maita Luna would have been part of an alleged criminal organization headed Fujimori and Montesinos In order to capture the Judicial Branch and the Public Ministry. In addition, the Prosecutor’s Office He pointed out that the former official allegedly integrated this group when he served as provisional superior prosecutor for illicit drug trafficking.
You can see: Víctor Zanabria after being suspended: “I am not ashamed. And if the decision has to be fulfilled, La Comblo”
According to the supreme attached prosecutor, Alejandra Cárdenas, Maita Luna received S/2,500 per month of the National Intelligence Service (SIN) with the purpose of “turning the will of all the functional actions that corresponded to him.”
Cárdenas supported his accusation in the alleged fax that the former former Sin would have sent to those who allegedly requested the monthly payments he agreed with Montesinos. According to the representative of the Public Ministry, this letter was corroborated by a fiscal expertise that concluded that the fax corresponds to its handwriting.
Likewise, the Prosecutor’s Office recalled that they have the testimonies of the former Secretary of Montesinos, Matilde Pincchi Pinchi; María Angélica ArcHey Pedro Huertas Caballerosextrabajadores of without the facts would prove. In fact, Cárdenas stressed that they have the statements of the exclusive intelligence service, who pointed out that “they delivered envelopes with money at the home of María Maita Luna Flor“In addition, he added that the name of Maita Luna appeared within the agendas of the presidential exassor.
You can see: Curwen about López Aliaga’s trains: “If the repair is more expensive, what is the use of?”
Prosecutor’s Office asks for 9 months of detention against Flor de María Maita Luna
Consequently, the prosecutor of the case has requested the Supreme Court of Preparatory Investigation, in charge of Judge Edhin Campos, who orders 9 months of detention against Maita Luna, time needed to take the judicial process to the Oral trial stage.
The order is made because in 2002, the date on which the arrest was ordered, a certain term was not set. Having been captured 23 years later, the application is made. Likewise, prosecutor Cárdenas warned a possible danger of escape and hinder justice by the investigated.
“The lady had been declared contumaz inmate since 2003 and had full knowledge of the process because she presented various writings to the process. Consequently, from the date of her capture until the time she was declared Contumaz, she has been fugitive for more than 20 years, evading the action of justice,” said prosecutor Alejandra Cárdenas.
For his part, the lawyer Pavel Alvarado denied that there is a danger of escape and obstruction of justice by his sponsor. The lawyer assured that his client has the same address of “all life” and was arrested a few blocks from his house.
In addition, Alvarado requested that the former prosecutor continue the judicial process from her home due to a health problem on her back with the aggravatingness of her 70 years of age.
Ex -Fiscal is pronounced
“Since this investigation began, I have participated in all the proceedings of the Public Ministry, because I was the most interested in that all this is clarified, because I did not want my work to be stained with many years. (…) I have had to use the right to the resistance that the international doctrine hosts. The investigation begins with an assumption, it is not fax, it is a copy, there has never been an alleged fax, it has a special material,” he said.
“There is a trade that says that I am not the author of the fax. They went to Sin to see if a fax had arrived from the prosecution to Sin. Why don’t they say that there is a expertise that says that there is no fax? (…) I cannot judge me for shaving things. It is my honor and they are asking for up to 20 years (prison). There is no money delivery test. If I had belonged to that organization, I It is an atypical imputation, “he added.
When consulted by the judge if he had knowledge of the detention mandates, Flor de María Maita said yes, but used his “right to resistance.” In addition, he mentioned that his lawyer appealed the orders against him and obtained a favorable ruling, but that was not notified.
