Vice President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner’s lawsuit filed a lawsuit with the aim of investigating who is above the detainee Nicolás Gabriel Carrizo in the plan that led to the assassination attempt perpetrated on September 1, judicial sources reported. .
The team of lawyers representing the Vice President provided sensitive information to the file linked to a possible link to Carrizo and requested that it be investigated in a reserved file, as Télam learned from sources in the investigation.
Carrizo is the fourth arrested for the attack: from his cell phone they emerged conversations in which there was talk of killing the former president with another of the accused, Brenda Uliarte, who in turn is a partner of Fernando Sabag Montiel, the man who tried to carry out the murder.
“Gaby”, as they called him in the WhatsApp conversations analyzed by the justice system, became known on September 2 when he starred in a interview with Telefe news in which he appeared to accompany Uliarte, and a group of supposed sellers of snowflakes.
Two days later, Uliarte was arrested and Carrizo, along with the rest of those interviewed by Telefé, appeared before the court to offer a witness statement and voluntarily hand over their cell phones.
On Wednesday of last week Carrizo was arrested by order of Judge María Eugenia Capuchetti after in her cell phone will find conversations prior to the failed attack in which he already spoke about the idea of killing the Vice President and other subsequent ones linked to the desire to hide evidentiary material; he even spoke of a gun that he allegedly gave to the assailants and that was not used in the attack.
“He was very close, the weapon failed, I don’t understand, he was doing well,” lamented the accused in an exchange of messages he had with a person he trusted, identified among his telephone contacts as “Andrea,” according to what Télam was able to reconstruct from sources. with access to research.
When asked about that and other conversations of a similar tone, in the context of his investigation, Carrizo replied: “I swear to God, what I wanted Andrea and my stepbrother to believe was that this was a plan, for purposes of fucking, making a show, it was not serious, that weapon does not exist, there is nothing. Investigate, look, I was never near Cristina’s house. She came here with cell phones, I had nothing to do with it.”
From the analysis of his communications, it emerges that in the first dialogues he had after the event that occurred on September 1 at around 9:00 p.m. at the intersection of Juncal and Uruguay streets, he spoke in a tone that did not seem to be “joking”, as he told investigators.
As the hours passed, however, the tone of his talks had begun to change and, while he warned his contacts and Uliarte herself that they were surely already investigating them, he tried to appear to take the issue less seriously. , as this agency was able to reconstruct.
On the other hand, the Judge Capuchetti rejected this Wednesday the proposal presented by Carriz’s defense attorneyeither, Gaston Marano, so that decree the nullity of the test obtained on his cell phone because he had contributed it voluntarily and as a witness.
It was a statement that Carrizo’s defense made before his investigation and that prosecutor Carlos Rívolo quickly opposed with the following argument: “There were reasons to seize the cell phone, since Carrizo’s conversations with Uliarte and the WhatsApp groups that shared with Sabag Montiel were research for the investigation”.
“If Carrizo had refused to provide his cell phone, the judge could have ordered the kidnapping and subsequent expert opinion, even if Carrizo was a witness and not a defendant (as he was until then),” the prosecutor had explained in the opinion to the that Télam agreed.
The situation of Agustina Díaz
Meanwhile, the also Agustina Diaz detained extended this Wednesday sor statement of inquiry before Capuchetti to clarify that he was not in the vicinity of the Vice President’s house and confirmed that she was only united by a friendly relationship with Uliarte.
Diaz’s lawyer, Javier Molina Diazreported after the investigation that “her geoposition (determined by her cell phone) makes it clear that on September 1 she was not near Juncal and Uruguay (the vice president’s home), neither was she on August 31 and that throughout the month of August, it hasn’t been either.
“It is absolutely clear that the images that were being broadcast by the media, in this case Public TV and C5N, were incorrect in that she was the person who was around Cristina Kirchner’s house,” said the lawyer.
Besides the clarification that she was not the one seen in the video broadcast on televisionthe lawyer accepted that his client also spoke of the “friendship” relationship that linked her to Uliarte and Brenda’s “fantasy” character.
Molina Diaz returned to deny that her client is part of an organization some and anticipated that in the course of the week file a request for “lack of merit” to be removed from the court file.
“Soon we are presenting the lack of merit because we understand that there is not enough merit, that is, there is no evidence, that supports that she remains detained,” said the criminal.
“I had Cristina killed; she didn’t come out because she went inside,” says one of the messages that Uliarte sent to Díaz on August 27, according to the file.
Diaz is still in detentionafter Capuchetti denied his release last Thursday based on the messages he exchanged with Uliarte, but his defense appealed the refusal to release him to the Federal Chamber, which will have to define in the coming days whether he continues to be imprisoned or not.
The appeal of the defense fell to room I of the Chamber, made up of magistrates Mariano Llorens, Leopoldo Bruglia and Pablo Bertuzzi.
