In an X publication on Sunday, Vice President JD Vance questioned the power of a federal judge about the Executive Power after Elon Musk was prevented from accessing the Payment System of the Treasury Department.
“If a judge tried to tell a general how to carry out a military operation, it would be illegal,” Vance said in his publication. “If a judge tried to order the attorney general how to use his discretion as a prosecutor, that is also illegal. Judges cannot control the legitimate power of the Executive. ”
In the American system, it is based on the separation of powers.
The publication triggered a rapid response from some Democrats, who criticized Vance for ignoring how the ESO separation of powers in the United States Constitution works.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWEM-byt8um
That “is called the rule of law,” said Congressman Daniel Goldman in response.
“Our Constitution created three co-adoles of government to provide controls and balances with each other. The Judiciary ensures that the Executive complies with the law. If you do, then you will not have problems. ”
Live David Hogg, vice president of the National Democratic Committee (DNC), told Vance that he should “read the Constitution.”
The Trump Administration and the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) of Elon Musk have faced challenges from the courts for their ability to access treasure data.
Musk asked on Sunday to replace a judge.
“Yale’s faculty should be ashamed,” said Engier John Yarmuth.
“The legal role of the judge is to define which executive powers are legitimate. It is called the separation of powers, in what you apparently do not believe, ”he concluded.
