A week after it was disseminated that the president of the National Justice Board, Gino Ríos Patio He has a ruling for violence against women, the counselor remains in office with the support of the Ombudsman and president of the Special Commission who chose him for office, Josué Gutiérrez.
It also has the support of the ruling alliance composed of Popular ForceFree Peru, Alliance for Progress and other political parties with representation in Parliament, which need it to control the judicial system, especially the Public Ministry and the Judicial Branch.
You can see: Ex -wife of Gino Ríos before the Molina police station: “He has physically assaulted me”
“It is a file that is no longer in turn, it is a sentence that is no longer in force, that is, it was already resolved (…) that is from 2011, with a legislation that neither the same organic law of the National Justice Board He addresses it, ”Gutiérrez said in an attempt to reduce the violence that Ríos Patio exercised over his ex -wife Obdulia Gildemeister Ducato.
Psychological violence
“The events occurred in 2004 and the Judgment was in 2011. The criminal figure of violence against women was just incorporated in 2015. In my case the non -criminal figure of family violence was applied, therefore, I cannot apply a rule that did not exist, ”said Ríos Patio.
The president of the JNJ has said that he will not resign and that his permanence will demonstrate that the institution knows how to resolve objectively. In spite of everything, an internal inquiry has begun to make a decision. With this objective, the vice president of the JNJ, María Teresa Cabrera He has requested from the Judiciary a copy of the file of the Divorce of Ríos Patio to know all the details.
You can see: Prosecutor investigates the appointment of Gino Ríos at the National Board of Justice
On June 9, 2007, Obdulia Gildemeister ratified in the La Molina Police Station His complaint for psychological violence: “He told me that if he did not quit he was going to misery and I was also going to misery my children. He also told me that he was not going to die until he saw me dead first to me, and that he was not going to stop from his threats until he got prey and leave me in the jail for life,” said Ríos’ ex -wife. He Judicial Branch He resolved the divorce for cause of violence against his wife.
Three to three
As it has transcended, within the Board there is no clarity or unanimity on how to solve the situation of Ríos Patio. The vice president María Teresa Cabrera and the directors Víctor Chanduví and Jaime de la Puente They support the permanence of Gino Ríos at the head of the Board. Meanwhile, the directors Francisco Távara CórdovaCayo Galindo Sandoval and Germán Serkovic Gonzalez have expressed themselves in favor of their departure from the institution for an ethical and moral issue.
The Board will continue to evaluate the situation as soon as they receive all the documentation of the Judiciary, the first week of August. Simple majority is required to declare the vacancy of Gino Ríos, who when interested is not voted. If the tie is maintained, there would also not be a way to resolve and that also favors the current president of the Board to select, appoint, monitor and control the judges and prosecutors throughout the country.
Gino Ríos hopes that over time the citizen pressure on the Board will decrease and with that changing the current trend that allows its case to be filed.
Contest to select new prosecutors
Meanwhile, the Board continues with the process against the Prosecutor of the Nation, Delia Espinoza for refusing to replenish Patricia Benavides as head of the Public Ministry. In addition, the public tender continues to appoint new Supreme Prosecutors, although there are no vacancies at this time.
New vacancies could be generated if Congress disables current Supreme Prosecutors. The JNJ and Gino Ríos seem to be preparing for that eventuality that has political interests.
A plagiarism case
In June 2003, the lawyer Roberto Pereira sent a letter to CAL editorial committeein which he expressed his discomfort for an alleged plagiarism of Gino Ríos, in one of his articles. Pereira indicated that between pages 91 to 122 of the Patio Ríos authorship “The application of the NOM Bis In Idem (sic) principle in criminal and disciplinary law“Texts of an article from a collective work were copied:”The sanctioning power of the administration and the sanctioning administrative procedure in Law ° 27444 ”.
