Over time
In a general council session, the INE ordered the publication of the list sent by the Senate and its subsequent updates in the Institute’s Gazette and in the Official Gazette of the Federation.
In addition, those who declined the application were asked to ratify it, so that it is confirmed that they will not contend.
Technical areas were instructed to review possible errors, inaccuracies and lack of information, to re -make a requirement to the Senate to send corrections as soon as possible because for the printing of ballots the lists must be closed before Thursday.
According to the INE Executive Secretariat, of more than 4, 224 people listed for different positions, at least 2,807 lack sufficient data that the INE requires to locate the candidates and fulfill their inspection work or there are diverse errors.
The totality of 1, 430 names listed by the Executive Power Evaluation Committee without voter key data. From the Judiciary Committee the total of 955 names lack contact data, CURP or elector key.
In addition, 422 judges and magistrates, more interim judges and magistrates, none has contact data, CURP or key of voter and also lack information about the positions they aspire to.
The INE is shielded
In the session, the majority of the counselors warned that all versions of lists sent by the Senate and not replace the lists must be public. This in order to be clear that the institute is not the one who makes any change.
Therefore it was questioned that on Sunday the first version that the Senate delivered on February 12 has been replaced.
“Who added or excluded them and why? The Secretary (of the INE) published something different, who authorized her to do so? ”Expressed the advisor Jaime Rivera, clarifying that the publication of changes was not supported without informing it, a demonstration that also expressed the Ministry of Claudia Zavala and Dania Ravel.
However, the President Guadalupe Taddei said that all the directors were aware, and the executive secretary Claudia Arlett Espino justified that he changed the list, for update.
All listing versions and their updates must be maintained public, for the purposes of certainty and transparency, counselors Zavala, Arturo Castillo, Jaime Rivera, presented.
For example, as explained, the number of candidates was changed slightly, “4224, then 4223, now 4221”.
The changes went beyond, according to Zavala: “At least we see 15 people who were in the first list that is no longer, in this one published. And six people who were not and now are. So how are we going to explain to citizens this? ”Said the counselor recalling the need to leave a mark of all the actions.
