Iván Evair Saldaña
La Jornada Newspaper
Tuesday, October 22, 2024, p. 8
The judicial reform is already under review and the courts will have the last word, not President Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo or federal legislators, was the central message yesterday at the first morning conference of judges and magistrates, which those present at the event called the judicial morning.
The conference was held in a haphazard manner due to technical failures in the audio and Internet, due to non-compliance with schedules – it started 30 minutes late and lasted one hour 12 minutes, double what was scheduled – and the capacity of the Crystal Room was exceeded
Circuit magistrate Juan José Olvera López was the first to speak at the event convened by the Article 41 Collective, which claims to be made up of 1,500 federal judges.
As a defendant they have their positions, they have their opinions, but they are only opinions. At this moment, in the face of dozens and hundreds of amparo lawsuits, not only by public servants, but also by citizens, the judicial process of reviewing this constitutional reform has begun; Right now, it’s time for the judges
he said from the Revolution Building of the Judicial Branch of the Federation (PJF).
He highlighted that against the constitutional reform there are hundreds of amparo trials, unconstitutionality actions, controversies and other resources
.
He criticized the fact that the suspension of the district judge in Veracruz Nancy Juárez, who orders the President to instruct the elimination of the Official Gazette of the Federation the decree of the constitutional amendment published on September 15. Judicial decisions are attacked or adhered to
.
They also called the head of the Executive to to consult your legal advisors again
as they pointed out that at different times the retired minister Arturo Zaldívar and the jurist Jaime Cárdenas recognized that a constitutional reform can be reviewed.
He added that article 61 of the Amparo Law is under trial whether or not it contravenes the Constitution, since it is the product of a reform to the same norm from 2013 that still does not have definitive jurisprudence that establishes that “it is an insurmountable rule.
That article 61 is being the subject of harassment in these trials. Judges we say that article 61, which closes the door for me (to challenge) is also unconstitutional, this causes the judges to open the door and rule on whether that article is constitutional or not.
In addition to Olvera, Judge Adriana Ortega Ortiz and Circuit Judge José Rogelio Alanís García also participated.
