In 29 pages of the Report and 26 of technical conclusions, he chose 6 lines that were distorted to justify his headline of Sunday, February 8.
Such obvious lies have short strokes and are quickly drowned. The report ends with this sentence: “In conclusion, as of the date of the report, the Shipyard does not have the capacity to comply with the delivery deadlines according to the Contract in accordance with the provisions of its articles 13 and 19.”
“The inability to comply with the established deadlines does not rest on an isolated assessment, but on the application of a critical path analysis method to the contractual schedule and its revisions, corroborated by documentary evidence and by the contractual conditions of calculation and extension of deadlines of articles 13 and 19 of the Contract.”
In another part of the long and detailed Report it states: “In conclusion, upon arrival of the indicated deadlines, taking into account possible authorized delays, the Buyer would be entitled to terminate the Contract early with the effects provided for in Art 21.”
In good Creole, terminate the contract.
Other “details”: “The production of blocks in the different workshops began without having completed the plan approval process” The workshops are 5 from different companies…
What we have been maintaining at UYPRESS before this inspection by Bureau Veritas was carried out.
“This procedure involves building “at risk”, contrary to good construction practices, and violates the diligent sequence that consists of closing the design, obtaining approvals and issuing definitive plans before producing.”
“According to this table, so far 16 Blocks have been built and assembled on slipways, which constitutes approximately 43% of the ship’s steel. According to the schedule, the progress of work at the date of the inspection should be around 70%.”
And the discussion and various maneuvers are over, there is an impressive delay in the steel of the ship, not to mention all the other works (engines, hydraulics, electrical, weapons system, etc.) that the delay is much greater.
Regarding the blocks already installed, the Report says: “Respect for the steel assembled and cut for blocks under construction by the different subcontractors, we can verify that there is some deviation between the Shipyard’s table and the reality verified by the Ministry’s inspectors, because some blocks considered assembled and cut are not 100% confirmed (C13B, C13C, C33).”
“In the double bottom blocks, the alignment and welding standard is good, in the double bottom blocks we also consider a satisfactory standard” El País clings to these two lines and forgets to read the following paragraph:
“However, we observed some joints between blocks, some high values of deviations, which exceed the limits of the IACS Standard 47. The COTEC memorandum num.006.2025 expressly refers to these deviations.”
There is no aspect that does not deserve critical mentions, much broader than what we were dealing with, for example, there are no internal corridors planned and therefore the crew would have to move on deck around the outside of the ship. The danger that this represents can be understood by the most illiterate in naval matters.
The difference between the amount of material that appears in the tables presented by the company and what is actually installed or in warehouses is overwhelming, not to mention the cancellation of the contract by the Caterpillar company.
But the white crooks responsible for this entire scam reproduce the headline of El País on the networks.” You would do well to read this entire report.
Please note that this report does not take into account the two guarantees, the one from EuroCommerce that is totally false, including the signature, and that of RedBridged, which aggravates all criminal responsibilities here and in Spain.
Technical report:
*Uypress Uruguayan news agency
