Pedro HernándezMagistrate of the TC, admitted that the Congress of the Republic was wrong to suspend and disable for five years to exercise public functions to Zoraida Ávalosformer nation of the Nation, for not investigating the former president Pedro Castillo while exercising his mandate. Hernández recalled that Ávalos was replaced in his position through a precautionary measure because he applied the historical interpretation of the Constitutionin force from 1823 to 2022, to protect the presidential investiture, instead of reading that some sought to impose.
Listen to the newsText turned into audio
Artificial intelligence
After being questioned by the journalist, the magistrate acknowledged that both the Parliamentas Patricia Benavidesex -fiscal of the nation, they were wrong when they intended to investigate and suspend Pedro Castillo while exercising their functions, because they broke with that interpretive line that seeks to protect the presidential investiture.
“The lady Zoraida ÁvalosI understand that with a precautionary measure, a constitutional judge reincorporates precisely for that reason, for what she did was not apply an interpretive criterion that many people wanted to apply. But what he did was maintain the argumentative line that was in force in Peru from 1823 to 2022 (…) Yes, they were wrong, “said RPP via.
Pedro Hernández He also recalled that, during the presidency of Castlethis was investigated by the Subcommission of constitutional accusations of Congress for his statements in which he pointed out the possibility of giving an exit to the sea for Bolivia. However, the TC He determined that the process could not continue because the complaint was not properly based, reinforcing the figure of protection to the presidential investiture.
“You also remember that the Lord Castle When I was in the exercise of the presidency, it was subject to an accusation in the Subcommission of constitutional accusations For these statements that had regarding a sea, this, an exit to the sea of Bolivia. Do you remember that you saw you a process? That process was amparo and the Constitutional Court He said he could not be investigated for the reasons that not because he was not well motivated, “he said.
Luz Pacheco, president of the TC, justifies differential treatment between Castillo and Boluarte
On the other hand, the President of the TC, Luz Pachecohe responded to the questions about the ruling in favor of Dina Boluarte and defended the suspension of tax investigations against the president. Pacheco justified the different treatment given to Pedro Castillo when he served as president of the Republic and assured that the ruling is aimed at the presidential investiture and not to the person who occupies the position.
“We have a very concrete situation (…) we never talk about the president, but who presides. Castle It is a very special situation, he has given a coup d’etat. I don’t think one situation should be equated with the other, “said Channel N.
