The National Superintendence of Health presented to the Constitutional Court a request for clarification on Judgment C-277 of 2025, which revokes the intervention of EPS Sanitas and is returned to its owners, Keralty, with the purpose of specifying the effects and procedures that derive from that judicial decision.
(See: EPS Sanitas: a new pulse between government and the health sector would open)
The action was filed on July 28 by the entity, which seeks clarity regarding the procedures, processes and procedures that must be advanced as a result of the provisions of the aforementioned sentence.
“For the sake of safeguarding the fundamental right to health in connection with life, the general interest of citizens and the defense of our own functions and acts, we submit this application”, Said the National Superintendence of Health in public communication.
The same day, The entity also filed a nullity incident before the Constitutional Court. This action aims to guarantee and respect due process within the judicial action in which the Superintendency was a party.
(See more: What will happen to Sanitas patients after the return of the EPS at the hands of Keralty)
EPS Sanitas
Bloomberg
As explained by the entity, the presentation of the nullity incident It seeks to protect your right to adequate defense within the framework of the ongoing constitutional process.
Judgment C-277 of 2025, issued by the Constitutional Court, established new provisions that, in the criteria of the Superintendency, require details for its correct implementation. In that context, lAt the request of clarification, it becomes a mechanism to avoid erroneous or contradictory interpretations on the way in which the guidelines established by the high court must be met.
Both judicial actions, both the request for clarification and the nullity incident, were submitted within the legal deadlines and in accordance with the channels established by the constitutional jurisdiction. The Superintendency indicated that these measures are adopted in compliance with its legal and constitutional functions, and in its role as an inspection, surveillance and control of the health system.
(Also read: Judgment of the Court by case EPS Sanitas opens revocation of other interventions?)
EPS Sanitas.
Archive time
The process of these resources could have direct impact on the implementation of the failure and in the obligations that emerge from the different actors of the system.
The Superintendency reiterated that its objective is to guarantee the correct application of judicial decisions and ensure that the procedures adopted do not violate the fundamental rights or the legal framework that governs their action.
(See: Keralty says he receives the EPS Sanitas ‘devastated’, after revocation of intervention)
Diana K. Rodríguez T.
Portfolio journalist
