These modifications are to the Amparo Law, to the Fiscal Code of the Federation and the Organic Law of the Federal Court of Administrative Justice.
Among the main criticisms made were to the concept of “ legitimate interest ” that is established in the reform, since the opponents indicated that although there were changes to the initiative of President Claudia Sheinbaum, the definition is “entangled” and continues to affect collective rights.
“Although they say they softened that article, they did not soften it, they tangled it. It means that it will no longer be possible INCHE He wins, ”said Senator Carolina Viggiano, of the PRI.
The tricolor legislator said that with these modifications to various laws, the admission of the amparo, the suspension and the execution of the sentence will be “restricted”, so he said that the “homeless people” are left and the government will be protected and the “powerful”.
Senator Amalia García commented that with this reform there is a “setback” in the legitimate interest and diffuse interest, which, they allowed the door to be opened to the defense of collective rights on issues, such as freedom of expression, health, equal rights for the LGBTTTI community, women’s rights unless they are criminalized to decide on their motherhood.
“Today with this counter -reform would be left out rights of collectivities, of entire communities, and would remain without the tools and remain if the tools to defend against projects that contaminate rivers or stand with their territories and exclude historically violated groups,” said the emecist.
PAN Francisco Ramírez Acuña explained that the initiative alters the procedures of the amparo trial to which citizens can go to citizens as a defense mechanism against abuse of power.
“We cannot endorse this reform that threatens the principles of progressivity and no regression, we oppose,” he said.
In defense, Senator Waldo Fernández commented that this reform prevents the amparo from being used for political or speculative purposes, so “his essence is returned that it is the defense of human rights”.
He also argued that “abuse” is ended in the use of amparo in fiscal and financial matters, because he said that with these modifications it cannot be used to delay and postpone tax credits or to release resources from illicit origin.
The Morenista Lucía Trasviña explained that with these reforms rights are not limited, but “closes abuse spaces” in which administrative resources and judgments have been used to hinder the collection of firm tax credits.
“The taxpayer retains the amparo as an effective resource, but the State recovers its ability to collect that is essential to sustain education, health and security. This reform is part of the route that Mexico has drawn to the world: the American Convention on Human Rights and the Inter -American Court of Human Rights,” he said.
His partner Martha Lucía Mcher said that with this reform the amparo ceases to be a protection for “powerful” and that they owe more than 60 billion pesos in taxes; This in reference to the owner of Grupo Salinas, businessman Ricardo Salinas Pliego.
