Mua’s death occurred at the San Lucas Veterinary Medical Center, located in the town
A new case of alleged animal abuse, This time with sad end, he met in the capital of Antioquia.
The story involves a canine of the Teacup pomerania, valued at at least 45 million pesos.
The owner of the animal denounced that everything happened at the San Lucas Veterinary Clinic, located in an exclusive sector of El Poblado, in commune 14 of the city.
Loading …
Lina Ochoa, explained that her dog Mua, initially He would have rugged at home, when he launched a bed. Situation that would finally have fractured his right leg.
Following this, Ochoa indicated that he was recommended that veterinary center, but this, according to her, ended up being her worst nightmare.
He says that by taking his dog Mua to the veterinary center, there they told him, after presenting the radiography performed, that the most appropriate was to operate it, but possibly lost mobility, at least in that leg.
It may interest you: Eleven -month baby is treated in Medellín after suffering from malnutrition
After the intervention, the situation was complicated when the dog began to present a food vomit and subsequently a respiratory crisis. It was then that Lina Ochoa brought Mua, again to the clinic, and effectively indicated, according to her, that it was necessary to intervene it, that is, nebulize her and then hospitalize her.
Finally, and as he denounced it, his dog died and, according to Ochoa, the way they confirmed it was not the best. He said that when he arrived at the clinic, the doctor who attended it immediately I greet her with the phrase “declared dead at 5:58 am.”
It may interest you: Shakira concerts left 12.4 million dollars of economic spill in Medellín
Given this situation, the owner questions both the treatment of the staff and the information delivered about the death of the little Mua. He affirms that when he saw his body, he already presented rigidity, which leads her to doubt the veracity of the death hour recorded in the medical history. For these facts, he filed a criminal complaint with the Prosecutor’s Office for alleged animal abuse, falsehood in public document and possible irregularities in medical care.
Clinic response
From the San Lucas Veterinary Clinic they indicated that MUA died on account of a secondary pulmonary edema to an acute respiratory distress syndrome. On the procedure and his death, they reiterated that what they did was according to.
“Mua received the corresponding treatment, including resuscitation maneuvers, but died in the early hours of March 17, despite all the efforts made, ”they said.
In addition, they indicated that “they emphatically reject the insinuation of an alteration in the medical history. The documentation was delivered to the tutor by an assistant who, in the face Doctor once all the case information is consolidated, ”they concluded.
In addition, they said that “In the San Lucas Veterinary Clinic we value each life equally. The value of a dog or cat does not depend on its price or its race, and we work with the same commitment regardless of its origin. Veterinary medicine recognizes that pure and small races have a greater risk of complications after trauma and greater susceptibility to acute respiratory paintings, and this was taken into account during all the attention provided to Mua. We reaffirmed that our team acted with ethics, commitment and foundation Clinic at all times, always watching over the patient’s well -being, “they said.
They concluded that, “the case of MUA reflects how exposed the veterinarians and clinics are against unjust public accusations, especially when pain clouds the recognition of effort and clinical complexity behind each case. This situation is aggravated when a tutor, being a lawyer and taking advantage of their contacts or resources, tries to damage the reputation of an institution through defamations in the media. For our defense and the evidence that demonstrates our good procedure, “said the clinic.
Source: Integrated information system
