Prosecutor Miguel Canhanya, from the Corporate Provincial Prosecutor’s Office Specialized in Crimes of Corruption of Junín officials, arrived this Thursday to the District Municipality of El Tambo to carry out a fiscal verification and initiate preliminary proceedings around the case of the businessman Fredy Coarita Coarita, who is already doing six days chained and in hunger strike in front of the municipality, demanding the payment of S/793,500 Musical
LOOK AT THIS: While Mayor of El Tambo Baila, entrepreneur is still chained at commune doors
During the intervention, the prosecutor also ordered that the employer be evaluated by a health professional, given the long measure of protest and his visible physical deterioration.
The proceedings also extended within the municipality, where the prosecutor requested an interview with Mayor Julio César Llallico. However, this was not in the building. The municipal manager, José Antonio Chang, tried to justify his absence claiming that “there are two municipal palaces”, one of them located on Julio Sumar Avenue. However, there is no regulations that authorize the mayor to dispatch from an alternate headquarters without being formally enabled as the main administrative center.
It should be noted that, since Coarita’s protest began last Thursday, Mayor Llallico has not appeared by the new municipal palace.
You may be interested: El Tambo: Entrepreneur has been chained, sick and hungry strike more than 100 hours
Municipal Manager responds
In the midst of this crisis, the municipal manager José Antonio Chang confirmed his resignation to office, although he has not yet been accepted and denied that this decision is related to the claims of the suppliers. He assured that his departure will not affect the process of the memorandum that he previously issued to perform an eventual conciliation with Coarita.
On the other suppliers that also claim payments, Chang said that their cases are different, since “there are no service orders or signed contracts.” He described the situation as “shared negligence” between officials and suppliers.
