With this reform, it was established that there are no amparos, unconstitutionality actions or constitutional controversies against congressional reforms to the Magna Carta; Nor will constitutional changes that were in process at the time of the amendment be contestable.
This change implies a “shield” to the reforms that Morena has undertaken and those it carries out in the future, hence the relevance for the so-called “Fourth Transformation.”
But now, according to the leaders of the PRI and the PAN in the Chamber of Deputies, Rubén Moreira and Noemí Luna, respectively, the section on “constitutional supremacy” was not included in the voted opinion, since the ruling occurred since August. , in the 66th Legislature, when that did not exist and Morena saw this reform as necessary when the judicial reform began to be challenged.
When eliminating the autonomous organizations, Luna and the PAN deputy, Federico Döring, agreed, the Morenistas did not realize that in several articles they eliminated entire recently approved paragraphs.
“They read it, they have legal advisors, the legal advisors did not tell them, they did not make reservations to fix that issue,” added Moreira, from the PRI.
Now the serious thing is that they want to compose this through an errata, Moreira explained, when they should have, via reservations, considered that this part of supremacy was already in the Constitution.
In his haste, the PRI member added, “but above all in his arrogance,” the two paragraphs modified in October were eliminated from Article 105.
“In theory it would have to go to the Senate, for them to change it there and return it to us to fix it, but there is no discussion of what was voted, not of what was manipulated, of what was voted, if that does not happen, the Mexican Congress is over. , you can legislate in the dark and you can legislate with errata,” Moreira pointed out.
