The congressmen Guillermo Bermejo and Guido Bellido They are investigated by The alleged crime of obstacle to the action of justice After attributing them the alleged not to have allowed him to former Bobby Eddy Villarroel Medina, known as ‘Sacha’, before the agents of the Directorate against Terrorism of the National Police (DIRCOTE) in an investigation followed against these parliamentarians accused of having links with the remnants of the Terrorist Organization Luminous Path in the VRAEM.
Given this, the Second Criminal Supreme Prosecutor’s Office ordered to formalize a preparatory investigation against Bellido and Bermejo, while the Judiciary will evaluate this Tuesday, February 11, if confirms the incorporation of the State Attorney General’s Office as a “civil actor” or “aggravated part ” The decision will be made during a virtual hearing that will be held at 9:00 am in the Permanent Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court.
You can see: Gustavo Adrianzén will spend more than S/42,000 on a trip to France to participate in the summit
At the hearing, the appeal presented by Guillermo Bermejo will be analyzed to revoke the resolution issued by Supreme Judge Juan Carlos Checkley, who enabled the Attorney General’s Office to request and access the payment of an eventual civil reparation in favor of Peru in favor of Peru , in case they are guilty of the positions to the aforementioned congressmen.
The Attorney General’s Office has raised in its application for incorporation as a civil actor that congressmen Guillermo Bermejo and Guido Bellido assume, in a solidarity, the payment of 247,500 soles as civil reparation in favor of the Peruvian State.
Research against Bellido and Bermejo
According to the Public Ministry’s hypothesis, congressmen Guillermo Bermejo and Guido Bellido would have hindered the statement of former Bobby Eddy Villarroel, aka ‘Sacha’, before the direction against terrorism (dircote) of the National Police. To do this, they would have resorted to various contact maneuvers through the lawyer Jhon Kleber Benites Tangoa, linked to the Peru Libre organization.
According to the investigation, in exchange for his silence, ‘Sacha’ would have received offers of logistics support, political asylum and protection for him and his family, although he perceived the proposal as a threat. Finally, although he did not come to testify before the DIRCOTE, he subsequently informed the Prosecutor’s Office about what happened.
