The imputation for legitimation of illicit profits against the former anti-drug chief, Maximiliano Dávila, was questioned by political opponents, who considered that It is a strategy to prevent the former police chief from being extradited to the US and do not reveal the data you possess.
“The DEA (US Drug Enforcement Agency) investigates Dávila for drug trafficking crimes, in Bolivia he was arrested for minor crimes. Is it about avoiding his extradition? we are supervising”, published in her personal account, the senator, Silvia Salame (CC).
Deputy Alejandro Reyes assured that the way in which the entire “operation” of the Dávila case was carried out is striking, because in 48 hours he was captured, transferred, charged and guarded, it seems that there was an unusual rush in the Public Ministry.
“The permissiveness of the ruling party to drug trafficking is increasingly evident as in the case in which the DEA discovered links between Omar Rojas, known as the Bolivian ‘Pablo Escobar’, with high levels of the MAS government”, published the group We Believe.
According to opponents, these facts expose a government that acts with a double standard because it tries to approve regulations such as the repealed ‘strategy against organized crime and international illicit acts’, but it is reluctant and inoperative in the face of proven accusations.
Later they also stated that the fiscal accusation seems destined to “silence” Dávila, who held positions of high responsibility in the Police.
The former director of the Felcn, Colonel Maximiliano Dávila, was apprehended on Saturday night in Potosí, on Sunday he was transferred and presented in La Paz and this Monday at 2:30 p.m. his precautionary hearing was set up, all in 40 hours from the moment of his capture.
The Prosecutor’s Office accused him of the crime of legitimization of illicit profits, a crime that is not contemplated in Law 1008, but appears in the Law to Fight Corruption (Law 004), the criminal type presented by the prosecutor Lupe Zabala, is what provoked the reaction of the opponents.
The imputation for legitimation of illicit profits against the former anti-drug chief, Maximiliano Dávila, was questioned by political opponents, who considered that It is a strategy to prevent the former police chief from being extradited to the US and do not reveal the data you possess.
“The DEA (US Drug Enforcement Agency) investigates Dávila for drug trafficking crimes, in Bolivia he was arrested for minor crimes. Is it about avoiding his extradition? we are supervising”, published in her personal account, the senator, Silvia Salame (CC).
Deputy Alejandro Reyes assured that the way in which the entire “operation” of the Dávila case was carried out is striking, because in 48 hours he was captured, transferred, charged and guarded, it seems that there was an unusual rush in the Public Ministry.
“The permissiveness of the ruling party to drug trafficking is increasingly evident as in the case in which the DEA discovered links between Omar Rojas, known as the Bolivian ‘Pablo Escobar’, with high levels of the MAS government”, published the group We Believe.
According to opponents, these facts expose a government that acts with a double standard because it tries to approve regulations such as the repealed ‘strategy against organized crime and international illicit acts’, but it is reluctant and inoperative in the face of proven accusations.
Later they also stated that the fiscal accusation seems destined to “silence” Dávila, who held positions of high responsibility in the Police.
The former director of the Felcn, Colonel Maximiliano Dávila, was apprehended on Saturday night in Potosí, on Sunday he was transferred and presented in La Paz and this Monday at 2:30 p.m. his precautionary hearing was set up, all in 40 hours from the moment of his capture.
The Prosecutor’s Office accused him of the crime of legitimization of illicit profits, a crime that is not contemplated in Law 1008, but appears in the Law to Fight Corruption (Law 004), the criminal type presented by the prosecutor Lupe Zabala, is what provoked the reaction of the opponents.
;
