President Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo criticized the Evaluation Committee of the Judiciary, because after doing A selection
Of profiles, “suddenly they said: ‘We no longer work, we already closed the process’, because they say there were amparos.”PHOTO PRESIDENCY
Alma E. Muñoz and Alonso Urrutia
La Jornada newspaper
Friday, January 24, 2025, p. 3
By supporting the order given by the Electoral Court of the Judicial Power of the Federation (TEPJF) to the Evaluation Committee of that power to reactive its works immediately, President Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo questioned that this instance has stopped operating before protection that He said, they do not proceed against an election or constitutional reform.
In his press conference, he said that the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation has no competence in this case, but the TEPJF, in accordance with the Constitution, so that that seems fine to me
what you determined, How good that he did
.
He stressed that the election of judges, ministers and magistrates continues, and will be on June 1.
Without reason
“The Court is not right to have stopped the process … It is the only issue in which it is not the maximum power in terms of a controversy, an amparo, of a trial.”
To express question, the president warned that before a negative of the committee to comply with the ordered There are sanctions from the TEPJF
but would not delay the elections, because the INE It is the one who organizes the elections
.
For a different time would be a new reform to the Constitution
because the Magna Carta has the times established.
The Senate, in the face of issues that would not have been considered, has the attribution to give guidelines
but the Electoral Court already said: Cut, you have to continue
.
The president criticized that the Judiciary Committee, after doing A selection
Of profiles, “suddenly they said: ‘We no longer work, we already closed the process’, because they say there were amparos.” But these, in an electoral process they do not proceed, insisted.
Improjence
In addition, he recalled that there was a reform – to articles 105 and 107 of the Magna Carta – that establish the inadmissibility of the amparo trial against additions or constitutional reforms.
“So what does the TEPJF Superior Chamber do? He says: ‘Corte, you are not right to stop your process, you have to continue urgently. You have until January 31 to finish it, so that the election can proceed. ‘”
