The new request for vacancy against the president peter castle who announced Congressman Edward Málaga, of the Purple Party, will seek first to secure the votes to run. In this attempt, there are some congressmen from Avanza País and the ungrouped Carlos Anderson, according to Parliament sources.
“The logic is not to first get out the calculator and see how many votes we have. I am convinced that this must come out by reason and not by force. That’s why It is important that the citizens debate and understand why the removal of the president is necessary as a first step to a solution and, then, with that citizen conviction, he is going to go for the votes”, Malaga explained last night on the Latina television station.
“We are going to look for which colleagues are increasingly convinced, according to the investigations that are taking place. And, in my experience, from what I am talking to different colleagues, I see that every time there is a greater conviction (because of the vacancy)”, added later.
YOU CAN SEE: Bodyguards of Pedro Castillo accused of being the main people involved in promotions by the Armed Forces. AA.
This new vacancy attempt has a group of congressmen in search of a solid argument that, unlike the previous two requests to remove Castillo, manages to persuade a sufficient number of parliamentarians to generate the previously avoided effect.
The draft text that is being worked on considers arguments about events that have occurred since the beginning of his mandate that have become detrimental to the country and controversies that generate investigations of the Prosecutor’s Office, elements that would show a moral incapacity of Castillo.
“There are additional arguments to consider, such as, for example, the handling that the Government has done, the issue of the appointments of ministers and senior officials that denotes a poor judgment of the president to govern, a problem in discerning an act of government from a act of clientelism, what can be the public, the private, conflicts of interest and This leads us to acts in the management of the president, which are not only bad management, but also do very serious damage to the country”, Malaga argued about the project.
YOU CAN SEE: Alejandro Salas tries to justify changes in the special team of the PNP: “It’s an operational issue”
“It is not the only argument, they all add up. The subject of the fiscal accusations, the management of designations, the subject of the thesis and the cover-up that has come to light with former Minister González. All this is a sum that (…) configures a logic that there is a permanence”, he alleged.
However, this initiative seeks to reach the Plenary of the Congress after an intense work of persuasion in search of generating a current favorable to the presidential vacancy among congressmen and citizens.
It is considered that the parliamentarian Jorge Montoyaspokesperson for Popular Renewal, who questions this attempt because it does not preempt a disqualification for Vice President Dina Boluarte, it is only one voice and they do not rule out seeking votes in their caucus as they advance.
YOU CAN SEE: Businessman gives doubtful version about “loan” to brothers-in-law of the president
It is thought that this new vacancy motion will still be presented in a few weeks, after this work.
boluarte waiting
The case against Boluarte in the Subcommittee on Constitutional Accusations of Congress takes on new momentum. A session of this working group has been scheduled for today, which includes the request of legislator Norma Yarrow, from Avanza País, to change the person in charge of evaluating it. Last week, parliamentarian Edgar Reymundo, of Cambio Democrático-Juntos por el Perú, was assigned. It is questioned that it was given to a leftist, who arrived as an ally of the government.
There is controversy about this session of Constitutional Accusations because the legislature has already changed and the working group must change its members in the following weeks. Congressmen related to the Government evaluate this situation, which could favor Boluarte: if his case advances in an illegitimate session, in the future he could seek to annul the result of the entire process.
YOU CAN SEE: Bruno Pacheco would have confessed to the Prosecutor’s Office delivery of money to Pedro Castillo
Prosecutor of the Nation awaits the president
President Castillo is getting ready to appear before the Prosecutor’s Office on August 4 and 9 for alleged crimes of collusion (promotions in the Armed Forces) and personal concealment (obstruction of the capture of fugitives).
According to his lawyer Benji Espinoza, it is still being evaluated whether the Nation’s prosecutor, Patricia Benavides, goes to the Government Palace or the president goes to the headquarters of the Public Ministry.
YOU CAN SEE: Train that will connect Lima with Barranca and Ica: what was the project and when would it be ready?
“There are two dates, both are in the morning. What is yet to be defined is that if the president, as happened in the case Tarata III, It goes to the Prosecutor’s Office or the Nation’s Prosecutor, in guarantee of what the law establishes, it comes to the Government Palace,” he said.
Yesterday, at press time, the president responded to a complaint issued in ‘Panorama’. “I emphatically reject the false accusations broadcast by the ‘Panorama’ program, pointing out that he would have received a ‘reward’ of 30 thousand soles. In honor of journalistic truth, I demand a serious investigation to clarify this falsehood. Exercising my right as a citizen and as president, I will denounce,” he said via Twitter.