the constitutionalist Natale Amprimo said in Perú21TV that what was done by the Executive, asking for a question of trust, is intended “to generate a confrontation scenario to receive the OAS.”
For Amprimo: “Going to a direct referendum is a claim that has already been evaluated in the government of Alejandro Toledo, and was rejected by the Constitutional Court. Article 32 of the Constitution says that the referendum must be after a vote in the Congress, for a constitutional reform in accordance with article 206″.
“The question of trust is related to the concretion of the general policy of the government. The regulation of the referendum is not a general policy of the Executive. The Executive is here to resolve and evaluate issues in education, health, housing, sanitation, etc.” indicated the constitutionalist.
“This claim is a provocation. The Executive is looking for a trick to generate a confrontation scenario to receive the OAS at this time. That outrage that was allowed in the government of Martín Vizcarra (with the question of trust and subsequent closure of the Congress) Nor is it possible because the law published last year and which has been ratified by the Constitutional Court says: the question of confidence is concluded according to the debate, the result is reported to the Executive and only Congress can interpret the result of the decision. ”
RECOMMENDED VIDEOS:
:quality(75)/cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/KCQfwZDO/poster.jpg "Natale Amprimo: \"Only Congress interprets trust\"")
