congressman Alexander Munante from People’s Renewal warned that the Congress of the republic it is not a jurisdictional entity and, therefore, does not base its decisions on judicial sentences, but in sufficient indications that shed light on possible irregular acts. Given this, he specified that the presidential vacancy motion – to be debated and voted on this Monday 28 – has the characteristics of “a subjective and political judgment.”
“We are not in the plane of criminal corroboration because we are not a jurisdictional body to be able to determine whether or not there is a crime. The presidential vacancy is a subjective and political judgment on the questions that are being given,” he told Canal N.
In this line, mutant pointed out that Congress will act responsibly and will listen to the discharges of the head of state. “We are going to listen to the President of the Republic in order to find out what his defenses will be against these serious accusations against him. I believe that (…) there are such serious questions, so well-founded, that they are even the subject of investigation by Congress, in the Comptroller’s Office and in the Public Ministry, therefore, there is seriousness in the arguments for this vacancy. The president needs to respond,” he added.
YOU CAN SEE: Pedro Castillo: why do they want to vacate it? Reasons that support the vacancy motion
Vacancy motion will be seen this Monday 28 in the afternoon
The President’s Presentation peter castle before the Plenary and the subsequent vote on vacancy motion will be held this Monday, March 28, on a day that will take place from 3:00 p.m. After listening to the head of state, the opposition will seek — through dialogue with other groups — to obtain the 87 votes necessary to remove the head of state from office of State. to get them, Castle Lumps he would leave office and his vice president would take over Dina Boluarte.
Of the 10 parliamentary groups, seven have voted to admit the motion to debate: Popular Renewal, Popular Force, Popular Action, Alliance for Progress (APP), Avanza Country, Podemos Peru and Somos Peru. Although it is important to point out that several of these benches would not vote in favor of the vacancy, since they anticipated that they would only support this resource so that the president goes before the Plenary to resolve questions, not to vacate it.
