The weekend, Movement for Venezuela demanded that the National Electoral Council on the prohibition of the party to run candidates for the elections of May 25. In his opinion, this adds “more violations of constitutional, political and human rights”
The Movement for Venezuela (MPV) said Monday that its decision to participate in the May 25 elections showed that it is an “extremely vitiated” process that closes “even more” an exit to the current political crisis.
«The performance of the CNE and the National Government intends to close even more the possibility of finding an exit to the deep crisis that our country suffers. Today with their actions, their vain excuses are collapsed to unlikely to justify the excesses that are committed daily, ”MPV said in A statement.
In his opinion, this adds “more violations of constitutional, political and human rights. Increasing its immense list of excesses, including the concealment of electoral results of the 28J elections to ignore the true winner ».
The weekend, MPV demanded that the National Electoral Council on the Prohibition to the party to run candidates to the elections of governors, deputies to the National Assembly and representatives of legislative councils. The organization also denounced that its national secretary, José Simón Calzadilla, appears disabled.
The party pointed out that all these violations do not pave the way to «find solutions and recognize the seriousness of the situation, the government makes its current crisis of legitimacy more evident and the increasingly diminished popular support base. What could be an opportunity for everyone, make it another sad show, causing another political tragedy that will only increase its own precariousness.
*Also read: First Justice reacts to applications: expels Capriles and another five militants
Movement for Venezuela reiterated that his decision to participate “was the right political decision”, and expressed their respect for the decision of the other political factors that called abstention.
There is, the party said, “arguments valid for it”, although they need that “our decision to participate put them in evidence, to have to continue committing abuses, increase its internal weakness and decomposition, although our intention has always been, to build institutional paths that allow generating conditions for real solutions to the deep state of prostration and needs suffered by our people.”
MPV called his militancy to remain organized “working and solidarity with our people, incorporated into their demanding, social and political demands, to continue fighting peacefully and constitutionally for change.”
*Journalism in Venezuela is exercised in a hostile environment for the press with dozens of legal instruments arranged for the punishment of the word, especially the laws “against hatred”, “against fascism” and “against blockade.” This content was written taking into consideration the threats and limits that, consequently, have been imposed on the dissemination of information from within the country.
