After the Constitutional Court declared that the value set in the Capitation Payment Unit (UPC) for 2024 was insufficient, the Ministry of Health filed a request to request the nullity of the nullity of the AUTO 007 OF 2025 with which this determination was taken.
(Read more: Ministry of Health asked the Court to clarify doubts for the readjustment of the UPC)
The request to cancel this ruling is based, according to the portfolio, that the High Court incurred procedural irregularities that They violated the fundamental rights of the Ministry.
“The majority of the Chamber did not guarantee this constitutional mandate (article 29 of the Political Constitution of 1991, a precept in which due process was established as a fundamental right) to the Ministry of Health and Social Protection by not making knowledge or allowing the Controversy of the evidence and/or documents close to the actors who participated within the discussion of the sufficiency of the UPC, that is, the health promoters and their unowsing “indicates the document based by the Minsalud.
Another arguments presented by the entity indicates that the Court did not present reports that support the insufficiency of the UPC of the previous year.
In that sense, the Ministry stressed that not knowing the evidence and technical studies that motivated and supported the order, could not controvers them, contradict or objectas well as ask for the evaluation of other tests. “Once again, it is observed that in this action the due process was not protected or respected, the right to defense and the contradiction”he said.
UPC
(More News: Petro continues to rearm his cabinet: he possessed new transport and labor ministers)
The portfolio also emphasized that “It is evident that the majority of the Chamber incurred a procedural irregularity by not giving the Ministry of Health and Social Protection the opportunity to know the evidence of the EPS and their units, as having inadequately valued the study of sufficiency of the UPC of the UPC of 2024, especially that the conclusion reached by the Constitutional Court was He acknowledged and extracted the content of Considering 22 of the 089 of 2025 “.
In addition, he assured that the high court that “You cannot base your decisions on the unfounded statements of the EPS and aggregations”. In fact, he pointed out that In case of presenting any reason for doubt on the sufficiency of the UPC, “It must have decreed ex officio a technical study that would allow it to establish whether the resources that are recognized are sufficient and thus reach a sufficient degree of conviction.”
It is important that the court ruling It was granted by the Special Monitoring Chamber to Judgment T-760 of 2008, whose analysis took into account the deficiencies identified in the information system within the health system and its impact on the way in which the value of this indicator is established.
(More news: ‘Of course it scares’: Petro says that Narcos seeks to attack presidential plane)
Portfolio
