Members of the Constitutional Court questioned by controversial ruling

Members of the Constitutional Court questioned by controversial ruling

Recoil. Votes in favor were from Morales, Gutiérrez, Ochoa, Domínguez and Pacheco. judges association protest by decision. Union will attend the IACHR.

The Association of Judges for Justice and Democracy (Jusdem) yesterday issued a protest statement against the recent ruling of the Constitutional Court (TC), which grants greater power to the Congresswithout margins of constitutionality control on possible arbitrariness of parliamentarians, in key processes such as the election of the new defender.

The judges stress that the TC has issued a ruling that is directly related to the model of the Peruvian constitutional Statewhich guarantees the limitation and control of power.

That control, according to Constitutionhas been assigned to the judges, but the decision of the CT generates uncertainty, which is why they demand the prompt publication of the sentence.

TC sources reported that said publication could be given the following week, also depending on the delivery of the justification of the only vote against the magistrate Manuel Monteagudo.

At the moment it is already public that the five magistrates of the CT who voted in favor of the highly contested ruling were Francisco Morales, Gustavo Gutierrez, Cesar Ochoa, Helder Dominguez and Luz Pacheco.

Source link

Previous Story

Women suffer more economic than physical violence

Next Story

Ear wax is not dirt: doctors recommend against using Q-tips

Latest from Peru