The historian Carmen McEvoy he questioned the legislator again and Third Vice President of Congress, Patricia Chirinos (Avanza País), for having promoted the presidential vacancy against Pedro Castillo after having belonged to Chim Pum Callao, a political movement that led the constitutional province to power Alex Kouri and Felix Moreno, now prosecuted for corruption.
However, McEvoy also mentioned that even though the full Congress rejected the vacancy motion presented by Chirinos, this does not mean “accept the poor performance” that has been taking Pedro Castillo, carrying characters like the former secretary of the Palace, Bruno Pacheco.
Next, he mentioned, during an interview for La República, that this rather allows “understand the extremely poor level of an opposition that, instead of putting forward concrete development proposals, lives obsessed with vacating the president (Pedro Castillo), without foreseeing the political and social chaos that this can cause ”.
YOU CAN SEE: Carmen McEvoy: “Castillo must amend the course and assume the role that history gave him”
On the other hand, when asked about the political inclination of the head of state, the academic pointed out that Pedro Castillo “is a trade unionist with a short-term view that it does not benefit him, much less Peru ”.
“(Pedro) Castillo disappoints because of his lack of clarity in government decisions and his lack of transparency. We think it would be different, a different president than the previous ones, but, From what we see until today, an heir to the patrimonial system that only a profound political reform will manage to dismantle has turned out., and this does not seem to be among the objectives of his presidency, “he said.
In that sense, he pointed out that what most He is concerned about the management of Castillo Terrones is that “he has not been able to prove that he is the president of the Republic of Peru, which implies the expression of dignity and respect for a series of protocols that he seems to be unaware of.”
