It already has five days of management. Diego Uceda, Mayor of La Molinafor the party popular renewal, has had his first outburst with the press. The new burgomaster was questioned about the ‘wall of shame‘, given that, by decision of the Constitutional Court, the demolition of this construction that divides the districts of La Molina Y Villa Maria del Triunfo.
Faced with various questions made by the journalist Pedro Paredes de Exitosa, the mayor showed his annoyance and answered severely. While the driver considered that the mayor criminalized the residents of Villa Maria del Triunfowhen justifying the wall for the invasion of land, Diego Uceda He was trying to pressure Paredes to “send his reporters,” or meet with cameras at the wall site, to ask the residents of the adjoining district if they felt affected.
Given that for the mayor the construction in controversy is not considered a wall, the journalist stressed that this construction “is not defined by the material with which it was built.” Then, Uceda questioned Paredes: “Are the cairns walls?”.
“I think he’s taking the interview to a level of disrespect to the population that lives on the other side of the wall”, said the journalist. The mayor replied: “I see your supine ignorance, and you don’t know what a milestone is.”
So, Paredes points to Diego Uceda for being “quite aggressive and lacking”. “The missing one is you, that you are a social resentful”, the mayor told him and then he smiled.
TC magistrate on construction: “Justice is for everyone”
The decision of the current burgomaster of the La Molina district, Diego Uceda, is not to demolish the construction that separates his district from Villa María del Triunfo (this divides Las Casuarinas with Pamplona Alta, to be exact). The mayor pointed out that he will maintain it to protect the Molinense properties from land traffickers.
In view of this, the magistrate of the Constitutional Court, Gustavo Gutiérrez, expressed his rejection of the mayor’s defense, and pointed out that he “does not have all the information on the case.” “Certainly, it is a terrible message that an authority intends to disobey a mandate from the Constitutional Court. There can be no justice for different social strata. Justice is for everyone,” he added.
