The congressman of honor and democracy, Jorge Montoyafiled a complaint against 4 former nation’s former National Justice Board (JNJ) for allegedly having favored the former president Martín Vizcarra.
In this way, the parliamentarian demands the dismissal of Supreme Prosecutors Zoraida Ávalos, Pablo Sánchez and Juan Villena, who make up the Board of Supreme Prosecutors of the Public Ministry, and against the dismissal Patricia Benavides.
The reasons for the complaint to the Jnj
You can see: Chancellor Schialer defends eventual designation of Demartini in the Vatican despite research in case Qali Warma
In the background, Montoya questions and points out that no head of the Public Ministry accelerated the investigation into a complaint filed by the Fujimorist ex -cancer Yeni Vilcatoma against Vizcarra on January 30, 2019 by the Workinasa case.
The ex -congressman Vilcatoma picked former Vizcarra president Of the alleged crimes of generic falsehood, omission of consigning statements in documents, incompatible negotiation or improper use of the position.
You can see: Congress: Peru Libre presents bill that aims to control and chase the media
Montoya emphasizes that the complaint was formulated when the prosecutor of the nation was Ávalos and that only on January 4, 2021 it was arranged to collect information related to the illegal obtaining of granting of good pro by the company workinsa when Vizcarra was Minister of Transportation , during the government of Pedro Pablo Kuczynski.
On March 25, 2022 the Public Ministry Preliminary proceedings began. For that date, Ávalos remained a fiscal. But five days later he temporarily assumed his counterpart Pablo Sánchez.
Then Benavides and Villena came.
You can see: Who is René Boluarte Zegarra, the sister of Dina Boluarte who works at the National Board of Justice?
The spokesman for Honor and Democracy considers that, if the case at that rate, the complaint against Vizcarra will prescribe in 2027. The former president faces a trial for the award of contracts at the Moquegua hospital and the irrigation in Lomas de Ilo.
“That slowness in the processing of the complaints at the level of the prosecutor of the Nation in the Public Ministry are a source of impunity and veiled cover -up, given the alleged political affinity between certain characters who held the Prosecutor’s Office of the Nation and Martín Vizcarra,” he said Montoya
Now it depends on the JNJ to advance that demand. It is not the only controversy that exists by Vizcarra, who is questioned from all flanks.
Other cases that weigh against Martín Vizcarra
In addition, Vizcarra was disabled from the public function by cases Vaccination and work And the Congress A new disqualification is also ready for dissolving Parliament in 2019.
This last constitutional accusation is pending to be discussed in the Permanent Commission and then in the Plenary.
You can see: Executive and Congress hit the judicial system
Yesterday the Permanent Commission approved a final report that recommends constitutionally accusing it by criminal organization in the vaccination case.
While the hunt against Vizcarra progresses, new accusations also appear against the head of the Public Ministry.
Attack to prosecutor Delia Espinoza
The attacks on the judicial authorities are becoming recurring. Interior Minister Juan Santiváñez filed a complaint with the JNJ against the Prosecutor of the Nation, Delia Espinozafor allegedly filtering to the press the disposition that required him to deliver his Icloud account and the chip of his cell phone.
The JNJ admitted that complaint to process.
In the same case, Santiváñez filed a constitutional complaint against Espinoza before the Congress. In this way, the head of the Public Ministry is cornered between two privileges: the JNJ and the Parliament.
In the way of Congress, the road is complicated for the prosecutor, because during their management several parliamentarians were denounced and there is the mood of passing the imputation. If so, Espinoza could be disabled up to 10 years of the public function.
