Marisa Grahamdefender of the Rights of Girls, Boys and Adolescents of the Nation, will act as mediator in the conflict of the Buenos Aires Government for the takings of schools motivated by the demand of the students for nutritious food and in good condition and by the slogan “No to the ACAPs”.
In order to “direct dialogue and resolution”, the defender He called to avoid “focusing only on school shots.” Also, Marisa Graham He clarified that “we are going to make some proposals, but we do not want a judicial process that takes three years, we would like a kind of mediation aimed at resolving the claims of the students who generated the shots.”
Also, Marisa Graham, in a tone opposite to that of the Buenos Aires government, said: “We believe that there must be mediation and dialogue, where girls and boys from high school are satisfied and the level of conflict lowers, without stigmatizing those who have the right to free protest and They are not terrorists.” This is due to the criminalization suffered by protestant students like their parents.
From the Government of Horacio Rodríguez Larreta, the police were used to go to the homes of the parents of the students who participated in the school seizures to deliver complaints where they had to pay 1.5 million pesos for each day of seizure. after notification. From different political sectors, the police actions were blamed for intimidation and intimidation.
The food and the ACAP
The defender He confirmed to the students that the agency will study and request that the administrative mechanisms for requesting food in schools be improved and will pay special attention to compulsory labor practices that are also not paid.
Regarding the viands, Graham explained: “With the viands there are several issues. In addition to the fact that they are intended to be of nutritional quality, there is a form that must be filled out by families who it is stigmatizing and discriminatory, where they ask for details about how and with whom they live and labor income, a salary receipt certificate; and many families do not have regulated jobs and it can be embarrassing to go through that.”
Lastly, the defender referred to the ACAPs: “A first law says that these internships are optional and the Resolution changes the system of this law, by making them mandatory and modifies its name by calling them “Activities of Approach to the world of work” (ACAP), so it is not clear what is that is in forcebut we know that a Resolution can never repeal a Law”.
