After the Constitutional Court will rule in favor of the ex-dictator’s release Alberto Fujimorithe magistrate Marianella Ledesma He assured that said sentence “validates impunity and, above all, breaks the institutionality of the decisions” of the maximum interpreter of the Magna Carta.
In an interview with Epicentro TV, Ledesma Narváez recalled that the pardon of Fujimori Fujimori, who has just restored the TC “has been result of an agreement to shield Mr. (Pedro Pablo) Kuczynski of the vacancy”.
Marianella Ledesma was president of the Constitutional Court. Photo: capture YouTube
“What message is given to citizens, to young people? That the end justifies the means. “If I can free my dad and I can reach an agreement to protect you from the vacancy by giving you my votes, in good time.” That is the message that has been given and that has been shielded from the TC. The administrative resolution that is being revived, of pardon, is the result of a criminal activity of bribery. I’m not saying it, it’s the Public Ministry and the criminal process that is being carried out,” he added.
YOU CAN SEE: Alberto Fujimori would not leave the country due to the Pativilca case
The constitutional judge also specified that the magistrate Ernest Blume (rapporteur of the case) would not have sent to the plenary session of the TC the file of the Commission of Presidential Graces of the Ministry of Justice with which it was recommended, in 2017, to pardon the former dictator.
“As far as I understand, at least, that file of the Commission of Presidential Graces has not reached the Constitutional Court”, he narrowed down.
Marianella Ledesma on the release of Fujimori: “The Inter-American Court will have to rule”
At another point in the interview, the magistrate Marianella Ledesma indicated that it is the supranational jurisdiction that must rule on the sentence ordering the release of Alberto Fujimoriwho would leave the Barbadillo prison as of March 28.
YOU CAN SEE: UN after ruling that frees Fujimori: “International law restricts pardons for human rights violations. H H.”
“In light of what the Inter-American Court has stated and the majority of the justices present as part of their arguments and the background of the case, the Court will have to rule. I don’t know in the sense in which it could have it, but the Court has already set a course on how it should be interpreted”, he explained.
Ledesma and Espinosa-Saldaña warned that the ruling could reach the Inter-American Court
During the debate on Thursday, in a reserved session, the magistrates Marianella Ledesma and Eloy Espinoza-Saldaña warned that the ruling in favor of releasing Alberto Fujimori could have implications for the Peruvian State because it is a case under the supervision of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.
For its part, Ledesma Narvaez He explained that he requested a preliminary question so that the debate and vote do not take place on the last Thursday; however, the request did not prosper.
