The regime aims to sell cats by hares with an alleged vietnamization of the economy, but without full political rights, every economic openness would be only a simulation.
Puerto Padre, Cuba.- “If we want everything to continue as it is, it is necessary that everything changes,” says Tancredi, a novel character; But beyond fiction, that urdir of appearances is the reason for catpardism as a philosophy of political pretending. Not in vain the catpardo becomes a symbol and recurring ally of those who intend to perpetuate themselves in power.
So and everything, we said In the previous article, When we advance these notes, that this literary passage of Lampedusa taken to the framework of public policies, in Cuba, has no place if, through the vietnamization of the economy and, therefore, of the territory and the jurisdiction, the communist dictatorship of the single party Fund because without plenary or universal political rights in civic and merely simulated exercise, as is usual, the Catopardo would bring the archipelago-Cárcel that is Cuba only modifications in the legal-administrative and socio-political discourse-and I do not say that I do not-, perhaps even with positive demographic and sociological transcendence, but never, never, never, real changes towards political freedom.
And since there is a suspected justified by its precedents, in the previous article we ask: “Will the Castrocommunist regime with the Vietnamization of Cuba show alleged changes to stay in power?”
The question is drawer because it certainly and as reiterated by journalists, academics, political and intelligence analysts, the castrocommunist elites that make up the controls of the Communist Party of Cuba (PCC), the Revolutionary Armed Forces (FAR) and the Ministry of Interior (Minint), which for well -known reasons are the institutions of real power beyond any other formal power of the State, without a doubt, without a For any lawful or illicit procedure they will do how much they can start the simulation.
Changing all the leathers of the chair to the stirrups and also the sweatshirt, with the shaft and the bad idea will be intact they will see lights of participatory democracy and free market when we know it, it is the communists who say in any area of the Cuban panorama, “you, you enter; you, salt”; Either in the economy, culture and in society, but with the participation of the Cubans themselves that José Martí called “colonial Cubans, and it does not matter if they reside in Havana, in Miami or in Madrid, using those” bugles “and by work and thanks of the catpardism, they will say that effectively in Cuba it works a” socialist democracy “as in China and Vietnam where the great private company has a private multimillionaire
According to the regime, it allowed micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs), in the near future and persuaded by the communist parties of China and Vietnam, the political bureau of the PCC could authorize true Cuban private companies, that they were beyond the trade of goods and services and will start strategic sectors of the unproductive economy today, such as the agroindustrias sugar, rice and grains all, agricultural, fruit and fruitful; as well as heavy industry, cement, metallurgical, mechanical, mining, electricity generation and how much private initiative exists, with lawful capital willing to invest in market economy conditions and proven legal certainty.
If those unlikely transformations occurred where the monopoly of the so -called “socialist state company” survives as a cancer that metastasis, placing not only the economic fabric but the entire society, could someone think that those changes merit, for example, that the United States lifted the embargo on the Castrocommunist regime in the same way that it did with Vietnam, but those who think so do they erroneously do so erroneously. The embargo to the Vietnamemic communist regime was produced by an executive order of President Lyndon B. Johnson – a decree, not a law voted by Congress – of May 4, 1964 that was in force until January 27, 1994, when a month earlier, the Senate and by non -mandatory resolution, he urged President Bill Clinton to conclude with the embargo, adducing, among other reasons, among other reasons, among other reasons, among other reasons, among other reasons, among other reasons, among other reasons, among other reasons, among other reasons, among other reasons, among other reasons, among other reasons, among other reasons Missing soldiers during the war.
But that is not the case of Cuba. The embargo on the communist regime of Havana is more than a mere decree: it was promulgated with the rank of law and no president of the United States can conclude it without the approval of the Congress. The Law of Freedom and Democratic Solidarity, 1996, better known as the Helms-Burton Law for the surnames of legislators who promoted it supported by Cuban American citizens led by Jorge Mas Canosaspecifically and not rhetorically, all and specifically each of the causes that can give reasons for the repeal of the embargo.
Among those requirements that would legitimize a transition government and the possible elimination of the embargo, the legalization of all political activities, the freedom of all political prisoners, the supervision of prisons by international human rights organizations, the dissolution of the State Security Department, the defense committees of the revolution and the rapid response brigades, as well as the commitment for the organization of free and fair elections in a period of 18 months, in the period of 18 months, in 18 months in a period of period of 18 months, in the that multiple parties participate in equal conditions and rights, establishing to that end an independent judiciary, and being sheddingly codified what the law concepts as a “democratically chosen government.”
In such a way and according to the saying, “one thing thinks the drunk and another the winemaker”, and if by the vietnamization of Cuba the castrocommunists think that they will sell cats by hares, they are in error, supine the transition; And not only the hierarchs climbed in power but also their “volunteers”, many “colonial Cubans” that paradoxically having naturalized Spanish or American citizens, understanding democratic societies, still serve as “trumpets” to the totalitarian regime with the same enthusiasm as in their primal days of chivatos, of that same police and of those same police The letter and the spirit of law freedom.
