Today: January 19, 2025
July 29, 2022
2 mins read

Lawyer affirms that privileges will not serve Cartes

Lawyer affirms that privileges will not serve Cartes

The Supreme Court of Justice, through its Constitutional Chamber, decided to process the action filed by the lawyer Daniel Mendonca, on behalf of Horacio Cartes against resolution 2102 of June 28, 2018, “By which Rodolfo is summoned Max Friedmann to take the oath and exercise the position of Senator of the Nation”, dictated by the then president of the Chamber of Senators, Fernando Lugo.

In other words, with this, the CSJ promised to analyze Cartes’ request to recover his seat in the Senate. What was striking was that it was processed, just a week after the former president had been declared “significantly corrupt” by the United States. After the wave of criticism generated by this announcement, Pedro Ovelar, defense attorney for Horacio Cartes, announced via twitter that on Thursday morning, on instructions received from the former president, he presented the withdrawal of the unconstitutionality action that the CSJ had processed on the 25th. July since after four years of its presentation, “the decision is absolutely inofficious,” he said in his own words.

Ezequiel Santagada, a lawyer and director of the transparency organization IDEA, said he doubts that the move was promoted by Cartes himself. On the contrary, he believes that it was a move promoted by the CSJ itself to distance itself from the former president. That is, when processing, they can reject the request after studying the merits of the matter. “It did not make sense from the beginning, what he is trying to do now makes more sense by maintaining that he is a senator for life and that he has privileges. Charters that he does not know will serve him due to the current composition of the Upper House, ”he said.

BACKGROUND

There are two similar actions that were already presented years ago. The first, in 2008 when the Court ruled that Nicanor Duarte Frutos, after his time as president, could be sworn in as an active senator. And in 2018, when the same Court ruled that Cartes and Nicanor could hold seats in the Senate. On both occasions, the same Upper House prevented the oaths.

The action was filed four years ago. A month after his presentation, in the face of a wave of criticism, Cartes himself stated that he was no longer interested in being an active senator for a matter of “dignity.” From the Court, they allege that the inhibitions delayed the decision to process the request or not in all these years. Antonio Fretes, Miryam Peña, Gladys Bareiro, Sindulfo Blanco, César Garay, Eugenio Jiménez, Alberto Martínez Simón and Luis Benítez Riera were some of the magistrates who refused to speak.

Ezequiel Santagada, lawyer.



Source link

Latest Posts

They celebrated "Buenos Aires Coffee Day" with a tour of historic bars - Télam
Cum at clita latine. Tation nominavi quo id. An est possit adipiscing, error tation qualisque vel te.

Categories

Pedro Castillo: review the subtle way in which the archbishop would have asked the president for his resignation
Previous Story

Pedro Castillo: review the subtle way in which the archbishop would have asked the president for his resignation

Next Story

Government approves extending the extraordinary Tariff Stabilization Fund for Covid-19 for one month

Latest from Blog

18 groups aspire to form new political parties

Fabiola Martinez La Jornada NewspaperSunday, January 19, 2025, p. 8 The last day of the current month concludes the period to notify the National Electoral Institute (INE) of the intention to form
Go toTop