The parliamentarian Katy Ugarte He had a rugged encounter with the press of Cusco When asked about his position against the eventual censorship of the Minister of Justice, Juan José Santiváñezthe pension system reform (AFP) and his possible candidacy for Senate. In all cases, his response was considered ambiguous or evasive, which unleashed a climate of tension.
Listen to the newsText turned into audio
Artificial intelligence
Regarding the situation of Minister Santiváñez, the legislator avoided setting a firm position. Given the insistence of journalists, it was limited to pointing out that “Congress is a political entity and is an issue that will be decided with its bench” and did not delve into whether it would support the censorship raised in Parliament. His lack of definition generated criticism for warm in a topic of high importance.
We recommend you
The Santiváñez and the diplomatic world | No script with Rosa María Palacios
Then consulted on the reform of the pension system (AFP), the legislator responded only that she had supported the last retirement of funds. “I voted in favor of retirement,” he said, without ruling on his questioned vote of the law that would favor the AFP’s, this answer was insufficient, because they expected clarity in their statements.
The most tense moment occurred when asked if he will apply for the Senate in the next elections. Ugarte did not respond, despite the insistence of the press. “Is she going to be a Senate candidate, congressman?” He was repeated on several occasions without obtaining any response.
The silence of the parliamentarian also unleashed angry claims of some citizens present. “You have to respect the people! And the people give you respect!” They increasing, denouncing a lack of transparency. Other attendees warned that these attitudes generate a bad example: “Our children how they look! Learning the bad!”
The incident reflected the growing distrust of Congress and distancing between authorities and population.
