The Federal Chamber of Buenos Aires rejected as “inadmissible” an appeal of the complaint of Vice President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner to review in a higher instance -Criminal Cassation- the decision to prosecute the members of the “Federal Revolution” group for a crime minor, incitement to collective violence and not by illicit associationas claimed by that party.
The Court of Appeals rejected the appeal before Cassation of the lawyers of the Vice President, José Manuel Ubeira and Marcos Aldazabal, against the decision of last February 16, in which the prosecution of four defendants was partially confirmed and it was concluded that there was no illegal association, according to the resolution to which Télam had access.
The Vice President’s complaint called for prosecutions for a more serious crime, illicit association, something that had been resolved by the judge in the case, Marcelo Martínez De Giorgi, but that was revoked by the chambermaids Leopoldo Bruglia, Pablo Bertuzzi and Mariano Llorens
When presenting the appeal to reach Cassation, the highest federal criminal court in the country, the complaint argued that “the decision adopted causes a wrong that cannot be further repaired because, since the criminal figures analyzed are so diverse, it is forbidden to the possibility of requesting the elevation to trial and of accuse the defendants of forming an illegal association to impose their ideas in a violent and undemocratic way“.
“Likewise, he described the sentence as arbitrary in terms of the analysis of the criminal type and said that an erroneous application of the substantive law was carried out in a case of institutional gravity,” as stated in the resolution.
Judges of the Court of Appeals They also rejected an appeal from the accused Sabrina Basileagainst the prosecution that was confirmed for “incitement to collective violence.”
Chamber I of the Federal Chamber of Buenos Aires declared the appeals “inadmissible” because they failed to “demonstrate the existence of a tax of impossible or delayed subsequent repair that allows –by way of exception- to grant the invoked procedural remedy”.
incitement to violence
The case that investigates Jonathan Morel, Nilda Basile, Gastón Guerra and Leonardo Sosa, as co-authors of “incitement to collective violence”, according to the new classification of the crime the House adopted in that decision.
The four defendants they had been detained at the beginning of the investigation but later they were released by order of the Federal Chamber.
Justice “is not willing to investigate” the attack
Senator Oscar Parrilli (Front of All) warned this Tuesday that a part of the opposition and the Judiciary “has reached the limit of democracy” and affirmed that justice “is not willing to investigate who were the intellectual actors and those who financed” the attack suffered by Vice President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner on September 1.
“The judicial party and a group from Cambiemos has reached the limit of democracy and has put it in danger. The goal is for Cristina to be dead, imprisoned or outlawed. There is no other option”affirmed Parrilli in statements to radio 10.
The senator maintained that part of the The Judiciary behaves like “a firing squad” that was armed “to politically persecute a leader like Cristina Kirchner which is the only one that today generates some hope in the town”.
“There is a sector of Cambiemos that does not care about democracy and wants power at all costs. Even with violence, proscription, killing and delimiting the adversary. This is what the sectors committed to Argentina within the opposition must take into account and make a difference,” he said.
“There is a sector of Cambiemos that does not care about democracy and wants power at all costs, even with violence, proscription, killing and delimiting the adversary.Oscar Parrilli
Parrilli affirmed that the attack against Cristina was “an orchestrated plan”. “The most serious thing is that justice is not willing to investigate who were the intellectual actors and those who financed it,” he added.
