▲ The President participated yesterday in the Villahermosa Chocolate Fair, Tabasco, where she announced the installation of the Bienestar processor.Photo Presidency
F
that violence called. This is how it was sung (in advance) and told (afterwards) by factors and actors such as the rhetoric of the false generation Z on social networks, the harangues of politicians in decline (Vicente Fox, in a pathetic way), the “newscasts” of Televisión Azteca and other media with openly factious behavior, the spite of fiscal origin of Ricardo Salinas Pliego and the opportunism of some characters without a true social base (Belaunzarán, Acosta Naranjo and Álvarez Icaza, among others).
A march mounted on certain debatable rails but, ultimately, frameable in the citizen’s right to expression, to protest: social anger over neglected and unsatisfied problems (markedly the predominance of organized crime), opposition to the policies of the 4T and the search for a social sector, supposedly represented by those walkers, to be heard and its demands to be considered.
But the burden placed on those rails had as its background hatred and the search for violence. This was manifested in the slogans, in the personal insults to the President and her predecessor and, finally, in the violent physical explosion against fences and controls outside the National Palace.
Previous propaganda invoked images and events from Nepal, with public buildings on fire and direct actions against senior public servants and their families. In the adapted Mexican version, there were specific calls to “take” the National Palace and “go” against President Sheinbaum and former President López Obrador.
However, what was long announced did not happen: there was no youth overflow that would shake the Claudian government, but rather a recycling of previous marches whose reference would be the call pink tide, in numerical terms of attendance even lower. The false franchise of generation Z (GenZ) only managed to demonstrate that it was used as an instrumental platform for maneuvers by politicians of advanced ages and backgrounds.
There was no politically viable plan or proposal. At the last minute, this GenZ issued a list of demands that could essentially be reduced to the demand that the entire constitutional order, politically and legally, be put aside so that they – who knows who “they” are – become the new rulers. Notable, because it lays bare the coup intentions and aligns them, like this “movement” in general, with the Trumpian guidelines of destabilizing action preparatory to major attacks against “progressive” governments.
The long-awaited outcome confirmed that this segment of the “new” opposition, which wishes to subsume the traditional one, is renouncing the exercise of politics and prefers the path that it believes is shortest and most susceptible to international support, violence. The attackers of the fences of the National Palace (the pink block, even if they are dressed in black) they arrived with equipment far above the usual and determined to achieve a graphically exploitable red balance.
Just yesterday, without a demarcation of the violence called, but rather a worsening of the insult and anger, the so-called Generation Z Mexico called for a new march, on November 20, with the same route in Mexico City towards the National Palace. The right and the extreme right will insist as much as necessary until they achieve the red scenes that enhance the repeated interventionist intentions of the United States.
The open bet of this opposition is violence. They seek to alter the processes that the so-called 4T has achieved with constitutional legitimacy, within the framework of the rules of the current system, between various contradictions and distortions. They are sending the institutions to hell.
And, while Morena, its allies and the National Palace review the deep causes of social dissatisfaction that remain, beyond the “Z” manipulations, until tomorrow!
Facebook: Julio Astillero
